Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Assembly Bill 867

Groundwater monitoring, CAFO fees, nutrient management plans, well construction rules, the SnapPlus program, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 7, 2020

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2020: “Fiscal estimate received”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Agriculture. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The bill increases the annual fee for concentrated animal feeding operations from $345 to $650. Under the bill, once every five years a CAFO must pay a fee of $3,270 instead of the $650 fee.

In addition, the bill requires DNR to establish a plan to expand nutrient management planning and cost-sharing availability to meet the goal of having all farmers and all manure landspreading operations be covered by a nutrient management plan by 2030. The bill also allows DNR to require groundwater monitoring at any manure landspreading location in sensitive areas of the state if a public health risk exists.

Read the full summary

The bill also requires DNR, as necessary, to establish rules and update existing rules relating to well construction and pump installation to provide enhanced requirements to protect groundwater in sensitive geologic formations.

Under the bill, DNR, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, the University of Wisconsin-Extension, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Soil Science must collaborate to update the SnapPlus program, to take into account nutrient loss. The UW-Extension must also update its nutrient application guidelines to take into account nutrient loss.

Finally, the bill creates several sum sufficient appropriations to ensure rapid response time for the State Laboratory of Hygiene to perform testing relating to water contamination; for DNR and the Department of Health Services to perform emergency testing of public and private water supplies near areas of known contamination from perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); for DNR to assist municipalities and the public in addressing local sites that are contaminated with PFAS; and for DHS to make recommendations to DNR on groundwater standards.

Who's behind it

22 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 22 are Democrats.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 30 names

Authors (22)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2020

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Apr 1, 2020

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Mar 3, 2020

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Feb 7, 2020

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  5. Feb 7, 2020

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 7, 2020 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope, Hebl, Shankland, Anderson, Billings, Brostoff, Emerson, Fields, Neubauer, C. Taylor, Zamarripa, Sargent, Subeck, Gruszynski, Stubbs, Cabrera, Milroy, Sinicki, Hesselbein, Ohnstad, Considine and Vruwink; cosponsored by Senators Miller, Smith, Risser, Erpenbach, Larson, Schachtner, Carpenter and Wirch

  2. Feb 7, 2020 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  3. Mar 3, 2020 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  5. Apr 15, 2020 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate