Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

AB 87

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: authorizing limited residency requirements for a city or village operating under the city manager plan. (FE)

Municipality — Council Village

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill authorizes limited residency requirements for a city or village

operating under the city manager system.

Under current law, a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th class city, as well as certain villages with

a population in excess of 1,000, may choose to operate under the city manager form

of government. Under this system, the elective members of the common council elect

a city manager. The election of the city manager must be based purely on merit, and

the members of the council must give due regard for a candidate's training,

experience, and executive and administrative abilities. A city manager is engaged

by the council for an indefinite term, and he or she is in charge of the executive side

of city government. Currently, residence in the city or the state may not be a

qualification for the office of city manager.

Also under current law, a local governmental unit (any city, village, town,

county, or school district) may not, generally, require as a condition of employment

that any employee or prospective employee reside within any jurisdictional limit.

Current law provides limited exceptions to the prohibition on residency

requirements for law enforcement, fire, or emergency personnel.

Under this bill, a city or village that operates under the city manager system

of government may impose a residency requirement on its city manager. The

residency requirement authorized under the bill first applies to an individual who

is hired for the position of city manager on the bill's effective date.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bowen (D) , Crowley (D) , Emerson (D) , Gruszynski (D) , Kitchens (R) , Kolste (D) , Loudenbeck (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stafsholt (R) , Steffen (R) , Subeck (D) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Vorpagel (R) , Vruwink (D)

3 cosponsors

Feyen (R) , Ringhand (D) , Smith (D)

Full history

  1. Mar 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Spreitzer, Thiesfeldt, Loudenbeck, Bowen, Crowley, Emerson, Gruszynski, Kitchens, Kolste, Sinicki, Stafsholt, Steffen, Subeck, Vruwink, Vorpagel and Ohnstad; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Ringhand and Smith

  2. Mar 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. Apr 8, 2019 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1