Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: livestock facility siting and expansion and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Fertilizer Livestock and meat Municipality
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes changes concerning the siting and expansion of livestock
facilities, including the following:
1. The bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer
Protection to receive and review applications for siting or expanding a livestock
facility if a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) requires approval for
siting or expanding a livestock facility in the political subdivision. Within two
business days of receiving an application, DATCP must provide a copy of the
application to the political subdivisions in which the property that is the subject of
the application is located. Within 14 days of receiving an application, DATCP must
notify the applicant whether the application is complete and, if not, what
supplementary information is needed to complete the application. After DATCP
determines that an application is complete, DATCP must provide 30 days for
receiving public comments on the application and may hold a public hearing during
this period.
Generally, DATCP is required to approve or disapprove the application within
10 days after the close of the public comment period. DATCP must approve the
application if the applicant complies with DATCP's livestock facility siting rules,
except that if a political subdivision enacts a more stringent requirement as allowed
under the bill, DATCP must approve the application if the applicant complies with
the political subdivision's more stringent requirements and DATCP's livestock
facility siting rules that are consistent with the political subdivision's requirements.
In approving or disapproving the application, DATCP must make written findings
of fact and conclusions of law and a record of its decision making. DATCP also must
provide notice of its decision to the political subdivision, the applicant, and any other
party that submitted written comments during the public comment period.
Under current law, an application for siting or expanding a livestock facility is
submitted to a political subdivision. Within 45 days, the political subdivision must
notify the applicant whether the application is complete and, if not, what information
is needed to complete the application. Current law also generally requires a political
subdivision to approve or disapprove an application within 90 days of determining
that an application is complete.
2. The bill requires a political subdivision to notify all landowners adjacent to
the proposed livestock facility siting or expansion and to approve or deny an
application within 60 days of receiving notice that DATCP approved an application.
Under the bill, a political subdivision may disapprove or prohibit the siting or
expansion of a livestock facility only for certain reasons, including any of the
following: a) the facility would violate a setback requirement established under the
bill; b) the site is in a location that is not an agricultural zoning district; and c) the
proposed facility violates a building, electrical, or plumbing code consistent with the
state building, electrical, or plumbing code.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 10, Noes 5
Passed 10–5 Feb 18, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 11, 2020 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Tranel, Tauchen, Kurtz, Novak, Ballweg, Summerfield and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Bernier, Feyen, LeMahieu and Olsen
- Feb 11, 2020 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture
- Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 14, 2020 · Assembly
Representative Loudenbeck added as a coauthor
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 10, Noes 5
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:18 AM on 2-20-2020 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1