Assembly Bill 922
PFAS management zones, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 17, 2020
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Environment. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates a process for establishing management zones for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and creates special requirements within those zones. This bill also changes existing grant and loan programs to prioritize projects in PFAS management zones, and requires the Department of Natural Resources to establish an advisory committee to assist in all PFAS-related actions.
Establishing PFAS management zones Under the bill, if a test of drinking water shows levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in excess of 70 parts per trillion (a positive test), the outer boundaries of an initial PFAS management zone is set at a one-mile radius around the location of the positive test. The area that is one mile outside of this initial boundary is designated as the testing region, within which DNR may conduct testing and research relating to PFOA and PFOS, as well as perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA).
Read the full summary Show less
If five positive tests for PFOA and PFOS are found in a testing region, the maximum boundary of an initial PFAS management zone expands to include the testing region and the area that is one mile outside of this new boundary becomes a new testing region. DNR may continue to expand the maximum boundary of a proposed PFAS management zone and testing region in one-mile increments until it can no longer find five positive tests for PFOA and PFOS in a testing region.
If DNR finds a discernable path of contamination, DNR must continue to extend the boundary of the proposed PFAS management zone and testing region in one-mile increments in the direction of the path of contamination until it can no longer find five positive tests for PFOA and PFOS in the testing region. If DNR finds a discernable path of contamination, DNR must also consider removing from the proposed PFAS management zone any areas that are not in the path of contamination and that either do not contain positive tests or that contain minimal evidence of contamination. DNR must also consider removing areas from the proposed PFAS management zone based on several listed factors, including hydrogeological considerations, likely sources of contamination, and physical boundaries such as public roadways.
The bill requires DNR, when testing for PFAS, to require testing to be done in soil and sediment, groundwater, surface water, drinking water, biosolids, and, if applicable, fish and wildlife tissue. DNR must use any testing data to advise in any PFAS-related permanent rules. The bill also requires any sampling to be conducted by DNR or by a third party with whom DNR contracts. Any testing must be conducted by the State Laboratory of Hygiene or a laboratory accredited for PFAS testing by DNR.
After it determines the boundaries of a proposed PFAS management zone, DNR must hold a public meeting to provide information about contaminants and their possible sources and effects. If, after the public meeting, DNR determines that a PFAS management zone should be established, DNR must establish the final management zone within 30 days after the meeting. The bill exempts DNR's creation of a PFAS management zone from the rule-making process.
Under the bill, a designation of a PFAS management zone expires one year after any emergency rules relating to testing in a PFAS management zone expire.
Requirements within PFAS management zones The bill requires DNR to establish, by emergency rule, requirements for public water systems that draw water from groundwater or surface water within a PFAS management zone to test their water for PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFHpA, PFNA, and PFBS and to submit the results of testing to DNR. The bill provides that such rules may not create a standard for PFAS contained in drinking water in a PFAS management zone, although testing results may be used to inform future actions.
In addition, the bill requires DNR to establish emergency rules requiring the testing of any biosolids from a publicly owned treatment works if the biosolids are spread in a PFAS management zone or, for a publicly owned treatment works that has any part of its service area in a PFAS management zone, if the biosolids are to be moved off-site. The bill provides that such rules may not create a standard for PFAS contained in biosolids that are spread in a PFAS management zone, although testing results may be used to inform future actions.
Notification and reporting The bill requires DNR to establish an Internet site for each PFAS management zone, and to include specific information on those sites. The bill also requires DNR to notify any local, county, or tribal governments within an initial or established PFAS management zone when DNR finds the first initial positive test, when DNR establishes a PFAS management zone, and when DNR establishes an Internet site for the zone.
In addition, under the bill, DNR must report to the legislature on the boundaries and method for establishing the PFAS management zones, the results of PFAS testing in PFAS management zones, plans for addressing PFAS contamination, and the technical and economic feasibility of complying with PFAS standards.
Grant and loan priorities The bill changes the existing well compensation grant program, the safe drinking water loan program, and the clean water fund program to give priority to projects addressing PFAS contamination in PFAS management zones.
PFAS advisory committee Finally, the bill requires DNR to establish an advisory committee to advise DNR on the promulgation of permanent rules relating to PFAS. The committee must include members of groups likely to be affected by such rules.
Who's behind it
5 representatives are its . All 5 are Republicans.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 7 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Swearingen · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Apr 1, 2020
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 27, 2020
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 17, 2020
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Environment.
-
Feb 17, 2020
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 17, 2020 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Mursau, Novak, Krug and Swearingen; cosponsored by Senators Cowles and Petrowski
- Feb 17, 2020 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Environment
- Feb 27, 2020 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate