Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Assembly Bill 952

Regulating certain chemicals in food packaging. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 24, 2020

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Environment. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Natural Resources to determine, no later than January 1, 2021, whether a safer alternative exists for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in food packaging applications. The bill defines “safer alternative” as an alternative that 1) would reduce the potential for harm to human health or the environment; 2) is readily available in sufficient quantity and at a comparable cost to PFAS; 3) performs as well or better than PFAS; and 4) if the alternative is a chemical, has been approved for food contact by the federal Food and Drug Administration. The bill requires DNR to submit a report on its determinations to the Legislative Reference Bureau no later than January 1, 2021, for publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register.

Under the bill, if DNR determines in its January 1, 2021, report that there is a safer alternative to PFAS in a specific type of food packaging application, then no person may manufacture, sell, or distribute that type of food packaging if it contains PFAS beginning January 1, 2023.

Read the full summary

If DNR determines in its January 1, 2021, report that there is no safer alternative to PFAS in a specific type of food packaging application, the bill requires DNR to annually review whether a safer alternative for that food packaging application exists, and whether safer alternatives exist for new food packaging applications. If DNR determines at any time that safer alternatives exist, DNR must submit a report on its determination to the LRB for publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register. If DNR makes such a determination, then no person may manufacture, sell, or distribute that type of food packaging if it contains PFAS beginning two years after the date of publication of the applicable report.

A person who violates the bill's prohibitions is subject to the same penalty that applies under current law to other general environmental provisions, which is a forfeiture of between $10 and $5,000 for each violation.

Who's behind it

8 representatives are its ⁠. All 8 are Democrats.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 1, 2020

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 13, 2020

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Feb 24, 2020

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Environment.

  4. Feb 24, 2020

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 24, 2020 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Gruszynski, Stuck, C. Taylor, Hebl, Pope, Considine, Cabrera and Stubbs; cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Ringhand, Smith and L. Taylor

  2. Feb 24, 2020 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Environment

  3. Mar 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate