Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: property tax assessments regarding leased property and assessments based on comparable sales and market segments. (FE)
Lease Property tax — Assessment Retail establishment
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill provides that, for property tax purposes, real property includes any
leases, rights, and privileges pertaining to the property, including assets that cannot
be taxed separately as real property, but are inextricably intertwined with the real
property. The bill also requires real property to be assessed at its highest and best
use. Current law requires that real property be assessed at its full value and upon
actual view or from the best information that the assessor can obtain from
“arm's-length sales" of comparable property. This bill defines an “arm's-length sale"
as a sale between a willing buyer and willing seller, neither being under compulsion
to buy or sell and each being familiar with the attributes of the property sold.
The bill also provides that an assessor may determine the value of leased
property by considering the lease provisions and actual rent pertaining to property,
if the lease provisions and rent are the result of an “arm's-length transaction.” The
bill defines an “arm's-length transaction” as an agreement between willing parties,
neither being under compulsion to act and each being familiar with the attributes
of the property.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court decided in 2008 that a property tax assessment
of leased retail property using the income approach must be based on “market rents,"
which is what a person would pay to rent the property, based on rentals of similar
property, as opposed to “contract rents," which is the amount that the lessee actually
paid to rent the property. See,
Walgreen Company v. City of Madison
, 2008 WI 80,
752 N.W.2d 689 (2008). This bill reverses that decision.
The bill also provides that to determine the value of property using generally
accepted appraisal methods, an assessor must consider all of the following as
comparable to the property being assessed:
1. Sales or rentals of properties exhibiting the same or a similar highest and
best use with placement in the same real estate market segment.
2. Sales or rentals of properties that are similar to the property being assessed
with regard to age, condition, use, type of construction, location, design, physical
features, and economic characteristics.
The bill defines “real estate market segment” to mean a pool of potential buyers
and sellers that typically buy or sell properties similar to the property being
assessed, including potential buyers who are investors or owner-occupants.
The bill also provides that a property is not comparable to the property being
assessed if the seller has placed restrictions on the highest and best use of the
property or if the property is dark property and the property being assessed is not
dark property. The bill defines “dark property” as property that is vacant or
unoccupied beyond the normal period for property in the same real estate market
segment.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Bernier (R) , Bewley (D) , Carpenter (D) , Cowles (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Larson (D) , LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Miller (D) , Olsen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Ringhand (D) , Roth (R) , Shilling (D) , Smith (D) , Stroebel (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Wirch (D)
40 cosponsors
Anderson (D) , Billings (D) , Brooks (R) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Doyle (D) , Edming (R) , Goyke (D) , Gundrum (R) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Katsma (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kolste (D) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , McGuire (D) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Ott (R) , Pope (D) , Quinn (R) , Ramthun (R) , Riemer (D) , Rodriguez (R) , Sargent (D) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Steffen (R) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Tauchen (R) , Tittl (R) , Vruwink (D) , Zamarripa (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Senate: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 14, Noes 18
Failed 14–18 May 15, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 20, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Roth, Bernier, Marklein, Olsen, Petrowski, Wanggaard, Kooyenga, Cowles, LeMahieu, Smith, Carpenter, Ringhand, Miller, Hansen, Wirch, Shilling, Larson, Bewley and Erpenbach; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Steffen, Krug, Tittl, Edming, Gundrum, Kerkman, Mursau, Quinn, Rodriguez, Schraa, Tauchen, Kuglitsch, Spiros, Novak, Kolste, Hintz, Crowley, Anderson, Stuck, Sargent, Subeck, Doyle, Goyke, Zamarripa, Hesselbein, C. Taylor, Riemer, Ohnstad, Shankland, Billings, Neubauer, Katsma and Ott
- Mar 20, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions
- Mar 21, 2019 · Senate
Representative Spreitzer added as a cosponsor
- Apr 2, 2019 · Senate
Representative Ramthun added as a cosponsor
- Apr 4, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 15, 2019 · Senate
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 14, Noes 18
- May 21, 2019 · Senate
Representative Vruwink added as a cosponsor
- May 22, 2019 · Senate
Representative Pope added as a cosponsor
- May 23, 2019 · Senate
Representative McGuire added as a cosponsor
- Jun 24, 2019 · Senate
Representative Considine added as a cosponsor
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1