Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Senate Bill 166

Eligibility for physician, dentist, and health care provider educational loan assistance programs. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 26, 2019. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 18, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2019

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 7, 2019

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2019 Wisconsin Act 58

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 26, 2019: “Published 11-26-2019”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes physicians and dentists who agree to practice in free or charitable clinics eligible to participate in an educational loan assistance program administered by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System under current law. The bill makes similar changes to an educational loan assistance program for other health care professionals administered by the Board of Regents.

Physicians and dentists.

Read the full summary

If a physician agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or “eligible practice area,” as defined under current law, the physician is eligible to have some of his or her educational loans repaid. Up to $100,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area and up to $50,000 may be repaid for practice in an eligible practice area. Current law defines an “eligible practice area” as a primary care or mental health shortage area, as determined under federal law, an American Indian reservation, or trust land of an American Indian tribe. Under current law, a dentist is eligible for repayment if he or she agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or dental health shortage area, as determined under federal law. Up to $50,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area or dental health shortage area.

The bill amends the definition of “eligible practice area” so that it also includes a free or charitable clinic. The bill also makes a dentist who practices in a free or charitable clinic eligible for educational loan repayment. As a result, if a physician or dentist agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a free or charitable clinic, the physician or dentist is eligible to have up to $50,000 of his or her educational loans repaid. The bill defines “free or charitable clinic” as a safety-net health care organization that uses volunteers and staff to serve economically disadvantaged individuals who are uninsured, underinsured, or have limited or no health care access. In addition, the organization must be exempt from federal taxation or operate as a program component or affiliate of an organization exempt from federal taxation. The organization must also provide services without regard to a patient's ability to pay and charge either no fee or a nominal or sliding fee for services.

Current law requires physicians and dentists who participate in the educational loan assistance program to agree to care for patients who are insured or receive health care benefits under governmental programs. The bill also requires physicians and dentists to agree to care for patients who are uninsured or underinsured. Current law also requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make repayments to all applicants. Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that a consideration does not apply to applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must ensure that the priorities do not disadvantage those applicants.

Other health care providers.

Under current law, the following health care providers are eligible to have up to $25,000 of their educational loans repaid if they agree to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or eligible practice area: physician assistants, nurse-midwives, and nurse practitioners. Dental hygienists are eligible for the same repayment if they agree to practice at least 32 clinical hours per week for three years in a rural area or dental health shortage area. Like physicians, the bill includes free or charitable clinics, as defined above, in the definition of “eligible practice area.” The bill also includes a mental health shortage area, as determined under federal law, in the definition of “eligible practice area.” Unlike the program for physicians under current law, the program for other health care providers under current law does not include mental health shortage areas. As a result, in addition to eligibility under current law, any of the foregoing health care professionals, except dental hygienists, is eligible for educational loan repayment if he or she agrees to practice in a free or charitable clinic or a mental health shortage area for the required time. In addition to eligibility under current law, dental hygienists are eligible if they agree to practice in a free or charitable clinic for the required time.

Like the program for physicians and dentists, current law requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make repayments to all applicants. Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that a consideration does not apply to applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must develop a mechanism to fairly assess all applicants under the priorities.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

20 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (20)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Universities vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Sep 30, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 1 · Sep 30, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 19 to 14 · Nov 5, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 3 adopted, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 26, 2019

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 26, 2019

    The governor signed it. It became 2019 Wisconsin Act 58.

  3. Nov 19, 2019

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 7, 2019

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Nov 5, 2019

    “Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-7-2019 pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(a)” (the official wording)

  6. Nov 5, 2019

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 5, 2019

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Nov 5, 2019

    The Senate adopted it, 19 to 14.

  9. Nov 5, 2019

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Oct 31, 2019

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Sep 30, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  12. Sep 30, 2019

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Aug 27, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. May 7, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Apr 18, 2019

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families.

  16. Apr 18, 2019

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 18, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Darling, Bewley, Carpenter and Cowles; cosponsored by Representatives Felzkowski, Riemer, Thiesfeldt, Bowen, Duchow, Horlacher, Kolste, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Myers, Rohrkaste, Skowronski, Spiros, Spreitzer, Steffen, C. Taylor, Tusler, VanderMeer and Vining

  2. Apr 18, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families

  3. May 7, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 23, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jacque

  5. Aug 2, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Darling

  6. Aug 27, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Sep 25, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Sep 30, 2019 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Sep 30, 2019 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  10. Sep 30, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Oct 31, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Edming added as a cosponsor

  12. Nov 1, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Darling

  13. Nov 1, 2019 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  16. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 adopted, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  17. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-7-2019 pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(a)

  23. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  24. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative C. Taylor withdrawn as a cosponsor

  29. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Nov 8, 2019 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  31. Nov 12, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Bowen withdrawn as a cosponsor

  32. Nov 18, 2019 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  33. Nov 19, 2019 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-19-2019 by directive of the President, pursuant to Senate Rule 44m (3)

  34. Nov 26, 2019 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-25-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 58

  35. Nov 26, 2019 · Senate

    Published 11-26-2019

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote