Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: using an electronic voting machine to cast a vote with an in-person absentee ballot and providing a penalty. (FE)
Elections — Ballots Elections commission Municipality — Elections Municipality — Finance Voting machine
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill authorizes a municipality to allow its electors to vote before election
day by using an electronic voting machine to cast an in-person absentee ballot (the
efficiency option). If a municipality adopts a resolution to implement this option, and
the Elections Commission certifies that the municipality is capable of
implementation, an elector may vote before election day at the municipal clerk's
office by completing his or her ballot and casting the ballot using an electronic voting
system. Using the efficiency option may occur simultaneously or in conjunction with
making an application in person using absentee ballot envelopes, but the periods for
voting using the efficiency option and for making an application in person by using
absentee ballot envelopes need not be the same. The votes are not tabulated before
election day, but the municipal clerk publishes the daily tally of the total number of
ballots cast before election day on the municipality's Internet site. The bill requires
the municipality to publish a notice specifying the locations, dates, and hours for
voting using the efficiency option and the location where results will be tallied on
election night. Under the bill, a person who acts in any manner that would give him
or her the ability to know or to provide information on the accumulating or final
results from the ballots cast using the efficiency option is guilty of a Class I felony.
The current law that applies to voting on election day with regard to election
observers, assisting electors, the availability of accessible systems, and the privilege
of absentee voting also applies to voting as provided under the bill.
Under current law, an election inspector may challenge for cause any person
offering to vote whom the inspector knows or suspects is not a qualified elector.
Another elector may also make such a challenge for cause. When a voter's
qualifications are challenged, the inspector must administer an oath to the
challenged elector to affirm that he or she will fully and truly answer the inspector's
questions regarding the person's residence and qualifications. The bill allows the
chief clerk, the deputy clerk, or an inspector to challenge for cause any person
offering to vote and to administer the oath and ask the relevant questions regarding
the person's residence and qualifications.
The bill also repeals the current law provision regarding the treatment of
absentee ballots cast by a person who dies before election day.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Craig (R) , Jacque (R) , Johnson (D) , Kapenga (R) , Kooyenga (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Larson (D) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Wirch (D)
26 cosponsors
Allen (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Brooks (R) , Considine (D) , Dittrich (R) , Duchow (R) , Edming (R) , Fields (D) , Horlacher (R) , Hutton (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Kulp (R) , Macco (R) , Myers (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pronschinske (R) , Quinn (R) , Ramthun (R) , Riemer (D) , Sinicki (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Tittl (R) , Wichgers (R)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Ethics and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jun 17, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections, Ethics and Rural Issues, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jun 17, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 30, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Craig, L. Taylor, Johnson, Kooyenga, Nass, Carpenter, Wanggaard, Kapenga, Jacque, Larson, Wirch and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Brandtjen, Brooks, Dittrich, Duchow, Horlacher, Hutton, Knodl, Krug, Macco, Myers, Pronschinske, Sinicki, Tittl, Wichgers, Edming, Kuglitsch, Skowronski, Quinn, Kulp, Ramthun, Considine, Fields, Riemer and Allen
- Apr 30, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Ethics and Rural Issues
- May 7, 2019 · Senate
Representative Ohnstad added as a cosponsor
- May 28, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 29, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jun 11, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Craig
- Jun 12, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jun 17, 2019 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Ethics and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jun 17, 2019 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections, Ethics and Rural Issues, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jun 17, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 14, 2020 · Senate
Representative Spreitzer added as a cosponsor
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1