Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

SB 200

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: storage and processing of sexual assault kits and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)

Justice department of Police Sex crimes Shared revenue

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, there is no statutory procedure for the collection and

processing of sexual assault kits. This bill creates procedures for transmission,

processing, and storage of sexual assault kits. Under the bill, a health care

professional who collects a sexual assault kit must do one of the following: 1) if the

victim wants to report the sexual assault to law enforcement, the health care

professional must notify a law enforcement agency within 24 hours of collecting the

kit; or 2) if the victim does not want to report the sexual assault to law enforcement,

the health care professional must send the kit to the state crime laboratories within

72 hours for storage. Under the bill, if a law enforcement agency has received

notification from a health care professional that a kit has been collected, the law

enforcement agency must take possession of the kit within 72 hours, and must send

the kit to the state crime laboratories for processing within 14 days. If the victim

changes his or her mind about wanting to have his or her kit analyzed after it is given

to a law enforcement agency but before the agency sends the kit to the state crime

laboratories for processing, the agency must send the kit to the state crime

laboratories for storage rather than for processing.

Under the bill, once the state crime laboratories takes possession of a sexual

assault kit, it must do one of the following: 1) if it has received the kit of a person who

has not consented to analysis, securely store the kit for a period of ten years; or 2)

if it has received the kit of a person who has consented to analysis, process the kit

and then send it to a law enforcement agency to store the kit for a period of 50 years,

or until the date of the expiration of the statute of limitations, or until the end of a

term of imprisonment or probation of a person convicted in the sexual assault case,

whichever is longer.

Under current law, local law enforcement agencies report certain crime

statistics to the Department of Justice. This bill requires law enforcement agencies

to provide additional data to DOJ regarding sexual assault kits collected and

processed in Wisconsin in addition to the data currently being reported. This bill also

requires DOJ to publish data on law enforcement agency compliance with DOJ

reporting requirements.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Cowles (R) , Darling (R) , Hansen (D) , Johnson (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Larson (D) , Petrowski (R) , Ringhand (D) , Risser (D) , Schachtner (D) , Shilling (D) , Wanggaard (R)

46 cosponsors

Anderson (D) , B. Meyers (D) , Ballweg (R) , Bowen (D) , Brandtjen (R) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Duchow (R) , Fields (D) , Gruszynski (D) , Haywood and Crowley , Hesselbein, Goyke, Billings and Hintz , Hutton (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kitchens (R) , Kolste, Stubbs and Hebl , Kulp (R) , L. Myers (D) , Macco (R) , Miller (D) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Plumer (R) , Pope (D) , Quinn (R) , Ramthun (R) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Skowronski (R) , Snyder (R) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Steffen (R) , Stuck, Milroy and Riemer , Subeck (D) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Vining (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wirch (D) , Zamarripa (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 4, 2019 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: SUSPEND RULES TO WITHDRAW AND TAKE UP

Failed 36–62 Feb 11, 2020 official source full page

Nay · 62

Not voting · 1

Full history

  1. May 8, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cowles, Schachtner, Darling, Carpenter, Hansen, Johnson, Larson, Ringhand, Petrowski, Risser, Shilling, L. Taylor and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Steffen, Sargent, Macco, Thiesfeldt, C. Taylor, Ballweg, Bowen, Brandtjen, Brostoff, Considine, Duchow, Hutton, Kerkman, Kitchens, Kulp, B. Meyers, Murphy, Mursau, L. Myers, Ohnstad, Plumer, Pope, Quinn, Ramthun, Shankland, Sinicki, Snyder, Spiros, Spreitzer, Subeck, Tittl, Tusler and Vining

  2. May 8, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts

  3. May 9, 2019 · Senate

    Senator Wirch added as a coauthor

  4. May 9, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Skowronski added as a cosponsor

  5. May 17, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Gruszynski added as a cosponsor

  6. May 28, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Neubauer added as a cosponsor

  7. May 30, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Fields added as a cosponsor

  8. Sep 19, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Oct 3, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Oct 4, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Oct 4, 2019 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Oct 4, 2019 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Oct 7, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Oct 7, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Senator Miller added as a coauthor

  16. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Read a second time

  17. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Nov 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Representatives Stuck, Milroy and Riemer added as cosponsors

  23. Nov 20, 2019 · Assembly

    Representatives Hesselbein, Goyke, Billings and Hintz added as cosponsors

  24. Nov 21, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Zamarripa added as a cosponsor

  25. Nov 25, 2019 · Assembly

    Representatives Kolste, Stubbs and Hebl added as cosponsors

  26. Nov 27, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a cosponsor

  27. Dec 3, 2019 · Assembly

    Representatives Haywood and Crowley added as cosponsors

  28. Dec 4, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Anderson added as a cosponsor

  29. Feb 11, 2020 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from Senate message and take up, Ayes 36, Noes 62

  30. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  31. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1