Senate Bill 239
Limiting the authority of the state and political subdivisions to regulate certain wireless facilities and authorizing political subdivisions to impose setback requirements for certain mobile service support structures. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Jul 10, 2019. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
May 24, 2019
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jun 5, 2019
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jun 18, 2019
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2019 Wisconsin Act 14
Latest entry in the official record, Jul 10, 2019: “Published 7-11-2019”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates a regulatory framework for the state and political subdivisions (cities, villages, towns, and counties) for the following: 1) the deployment by wireless services and infrastructure providers (wireless providers) of wireless equipment and facilities, including the placement of such items in rights-of-way (ROW); 2) the permitting process for certain activities by wireless providers; 3) the regulation of access to certain governmental structures by wireless providers; and 4) the resolution of disputes. The bill also authorizes political subdivisions to impose setback requirements for certain mobile service support structures.
Key terms The bill creates definitions for the following terms that are used in the analysis below:
Read the full summary Show less
1. “Small wireless facility” means specified antenna equipment at a fixed location that enables wireless service and that meets size, height, and other requirements.
2. “Utility pole” means any of the following: a pole used by a communications service provider; a pole used for electric distribution, lighting, traffic control, signage, or a similar function; or a pole used for collocating a small wireless facility.
3. “Collocate” means to place, mount, replace, modify, operate, or maintain a small wireless facility on a utility pole or wireless support structure. “ Collocate” also means to place, mount, replace, modify, operate, or maintain ground-mounted antenna equipment adjacent to a utility pole or wireless support structure.
4. “Governmental pole” means a utility pole owned or operated by the state or a political subdivision in ROW.
5. “Utility pole for designated services” (UPDS) means a governmental pole or a utility pole owned or operated by a utility district that is used to carry electric distribution lines or cables or wires for telecommunications, cable, or electric service.
6. “Wireless support structure” means a freestanding structure capable of supporting small wireless facilities, but does not include a utility pole or a structure designed solely for collocating small wireless facilities.
Rights-of-way With regard to ROW, the bill does the following:
1. Prohibits the state and political subdivisions from entering into an exclusive agreement with any person for the use of ROW for the construction, operation, or maintenance of small wireless facilities, wireless support structures, or for the collocation of small wireless facilities.
2. Provides that the state and political subdivisions may impose nondiscriminatory rates or fees on wireless providers only if they charge other entities for the use of ROW, subject to a number of conditions and limitations.
3. Subject to a number of exceptions, and notwithstanding a political subdivision's zoning ordinances, authorizes a wireless provider to collocate small wireless facilities and construct, modify, maintain, and replace utility poles that support small wireless facilities, along, across, upon, and under ROW, provided such activity does not obstruct or hinder travel, drainage, maintenance, or the public health or safety or impede other uses of ROW by communications service providers, public utilities, or cooperatives.
4. Limits the height of utility poles and small wireless facilities. With regard to the rights of a wireless provider to construct or modify utility poles, the bill allows a political subdivision to propose an alternate location for collocation, which the wireless provider must use if it has the right to do so and the alternate location is reasonable and technically feasible and does not impose material additional costs.
5. Allows the state or political subdivisions to require a wireless provider to repair all damage that is directly caused by its activities in ROW that involve small wireless facilities, utility poles, and wireless support structures.
6. Generally requires a wireless provider to indemnify and hold harmless a political subdivision for any liability and loss from personal injury or property damage that results from the use or occupancy of ROW by the wireless provider.
7. Prohibits political subdivisions from doing any of the following in a way that exceeds federal or state regulatory requirements: regulating communications service facilities in rights-of-way; regulating communications service; or imposing certain charges relating to communications service provided over facilities in rights-of-way. “Communications service” is defined as cable television, telecommunications, information, or wireless service.
8. Creates a rights-of-way study committee consisting of the governor, legislators, and representatives of public and private stakeholders.
Permitting process With regard to the activities of a wireless provider to collocate small wireless facilities within and outside a ROW and to install, modify, or replace associated utility poles within a ROW, the bill does the following:
1. Subject to a number of exceptions, prohibits the state and political subdivisions from prohibiting, regulating, or charging any person for the collocation of small wireless facilities.
2. Notwithstanding a political subdivision's zoning ordinances, classifies small wireless facilities as a permitted use that is not subject to such zoning ordinances if they are collocated in or outside a ROW if the property is not zoned exclusively for single-family residential use.
3. Subject to a number of conditions, authorizes the state and political subdivisions to require an application for a permit to collocate a small wireless facility and to construct and operate a new or replacement utility pole if the permit is of general applicability and does not apply exclusively to small wireless facilities.
The bill specifies the types of information that can be required in a permit application. The bill imposes various deadlines relating to the permit application and approval process. If the state or a political subdivision misses a deadline for an application, the bill allows the applicant to consider the application approved.
4. Requires the state or political subdivisions to approve permit applications unless the application interferes with rights-of-way, as specified in the bill, or does not meet applicable codes, which are defined as state codes related to electrical wiring, plumbing, and fire prevention; commercial building codes; uniform dwelling codes; and local amendments to those codes. However, the bill allows the state or a political subdivision to condition approval of a permit on compliance with reasonable and nondiscriminatory relocation, abandonment, or bonding requirements that are consistent with state law applicable to other occupiers of ROW.
5. Prohibits the state and political subdivisions from requiring an applicant to perform services unrelated to the approval sought, and prohibits such governmental units from requiring a wireless provider permit applicant to provide more information in its permit application than the governmental unit requires of communications service providers for the same type of permit.
6. Requires an applicant whose permit application is approved to commence the activity authorized by the permit within 365 days after its receipt and requires the applicant to pursue work on the activity until completion. However, the bill prohibits the state and political subdivisions from placing any time limit on an application related to the permit.
7. Prohibits the state and political subdivisions from imposing express or de facto moratorium on filing, receiving, or processing applications, or issuing permits.
8. Subject to specified conditions, allows a political subdivision to adopt aesthetic requirements for deployment of small wireless facilities and associated antenna equipment and utility poles in rights-of-way.
9. Authorizes a political subdivision to enact an ordinance to prohibit, in a nondiscriminatory way, a communications service provider from installing utility poles or wireless support structures in the ROW of a historic district or an area in which all utilities are located underground (underground district), except that the ordinance may not prohibit collocations or the replacement of existing structures, and the ordinance must satisfy specified requirements. The bill also allows a political subdivision to impose certain aesthetic requirements in a historic or underground district.
10. Subject to specified monetary limits and adjustments based on actions by the Federal Communications Commission, authorizes the state and political subdivisions to charge an application fee for permits. Generally, neither the state nor a political subdivision may require applications, permits, fees, or other approvals for routine maintenance, the replacement of small wireless facilities with substantially similar or smaller facilities, or certain activities involving micro wireless facilities that are strung on cables between existing utility poles.
Access to governmental structures With regard to regulating access to governmental structures, the bill does the following:
1. Prohibits a person who owns or controls a governmental pole or UPDS from entering into an exclusive arrangement with any person for the right to attach to or use such poles, and prohibits the owner of such poles from imposing discriminatory fees, charges, or other terms and conditions.
2. Provides that the rate a political subdivision may charge for collocating a small wireless facility on a UPDS is governed by agreement between the political subdivision and a wireless provider and provides that, if no agreement is reached, the rate is subject to the Public Service Commission's authority under current law.
3. Subject to a number of conditions and adjustments based on FCC actions, limits the rate an owner of a governmental pole, other than a UPDS, charges another person to collocate on the pole to an amount that is sufficient to recover the owner's actual, direct, and reasonable costs, subject to a maximum of $250 per small wireless facility per year.
4. Specifies deadlines for the state and political subdivisions to make available rates, fees, and terms for collocation of small wireless facilities on governmental poles that comply with the bill's requirements and to amend existing agreements relating to collocation in the ROW.
5. Provides that a person who owns or controls a governmental pole other than a UPDS may not require more make-ready work than required to meet applicable codes or industry standards, and prohibits fees for make-ready work from including costs related to preexisting conditions, prior damage, or noncompliance with current standards. Such fees may not exceed actual costs or the amount charged to other communications service providers for similar work.
Dispute resolution The bill requires courts to determine disputes regarding the bill's requirements, except that, as noted above, subject to court review, the PSC resolves disputes over the rates charged by a political subdivision for collocating a small wireless facility on a UPDS. The bill also provides a mechanism for political subdivisions to allow the placement of a small wireless facility or utility pole at a temporary rate pending the resolution of a ROW dispute.
Setback requirements for a mobile service support structure Generally, under current law, a political subdivision may not impose a setback requirement for a mobile service support structure. This bill grants a political subdivision limited authority to impose a setback requirement on the placement or substantial modification of such a mobile service support structure with regard to new or substantially modified structures. Under the bill, a requirement could apply only to a structure that is constructed on land that is zoned for only single-family residential use or on adjacent land. In addition, the setback requirement must be based on the height of the proposed structure, and the requirement may not exceed the height of the proposed structure. The bill also provides, however, that a setback requirement does not apply to an existing or new utility pole, or wireless support structure that supports small wireless facilities, if the pole or facility meets the height limitations specified in the bill for such a pole or facility.
Down Down /2019/related/proposals/sb239 true proposaltext /2019/related/proposals/sb239 proposaltext/2019/REG/SB239 proposaltext/2019/REG/SB239 section true Menu » 2019 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » SB239: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {
$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });
});
Who's behind it
10 senators are its . 7 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.
20 more lawmakers .
See all 30 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Devin LeMahieu · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (20)
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- Cindi Duchow · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Staush Gruszynski · Democrat, Assembly
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Kuglitsch · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Adam Neylon · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Rohrkaste · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Amanda Stuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Don Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 8 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Utilities and Housing vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 1 · May 31, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Utilities and Housing vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 1 · May 31, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 22 to 10 · Jun 5, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 22, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 21 to 10 · Jun 5, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 3 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 22 to 10 · Jun 5, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 4 rejected, Ayes 22, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 20 to 10 · Jun 5, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 5 rejected, Ayes 20, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 21 to 10 · Jun 5, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 6 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 27 to 5 · Jun 5, 2019 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (27)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Patty Schachtner (D, 10)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (5)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Jul 10, 2019
The new law was published.
-
Jul 10, 2019
The governor signed it. It became 2019 Wisconsin Act 14.
-
Jul 9, 2019
Sent to the governor.
-
Jun 18, 2019
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jun 10, 2019
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 5, 2019
The Assembly received it.
-
Jun 5, 2019
The Senate passed it, 27 to 5.
-
Jun 5, 2019
The Senate adopted it.
-
May 31, 2019
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
May 31, 2019
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)
-
May 29, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 29, 2019
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 24, 2019
Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities and Housing.
-
May 24, 2019
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- May 24, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators LeMahieu, Hansen, Feyen, Johnson, Cowles, Nass, Wanggaard, Tiffany, Smith and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Kuglitsch, Fields, Neylon, Stuck, Considine, Duchow, Felzkowski, Gruszynski, Horlacher, Kulp, Mursau, Novak, Rohrkaste, Snyder, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tusler, Vruwink, Subeck and Spiros
- May 24, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities and Housing
- May 29, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- May 29, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 30, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator LeMahieu
- May 31, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- May 31, 2019 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- May 31, 2019 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- May 31, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jun 3, 2019 · Senate
Placed on calendar 6-5-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Carpenter, L. Taylor, Miller and Risser
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senators Carpenter, L. Taylor, Miller and Risser
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 4 offered by Senators Carpenter, L. Taylor and Risser
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 5 offered by Senators Carpenter, Risser, L. Taylor and Ringhand
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 6 offered by Senators Carpenter, L. Taylor, Miller and Risser
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 22, Noes 10
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 3 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 4 rejected, Ayes 22, Noes 10
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 5 rejected, Ayes 20, Noes 10
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 6 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 27, Noes 5
- Jun 5, 2019 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 5, 2019 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jun 10, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 13, 2019 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-18-2019 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 18, 2019 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jun 25, 2019 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Jun 25, 2019 · Senate
LRB correction
- Jul 9, 2019 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 7-9-2019
- Jul 10, 2019 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 7-10-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 14
- Jul 10, 2019 · Senate
Published 7-11-2019
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote