Senate Bill 255
Regulation of transportation network companies and their drivers and providing a penalty. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 6, 2019
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes several changes to the laws governing transportation network companies (TNCs) and their participating drivers in Wisconsin, including the following:
1. Requires each TNC to establish complaint procedures for 1) reporting a participating driver's discrimination against a passenger or prospective passenger;
Read the full summary Show less
and 2) reporting a participating driver's suspected sex offense or crime involving fraud, theft, damage to property, violence, an act of terror, or the use of a motor vehicle in the commission of a crime. Under current law, a TNC is required to establish complaint procedures only with respect to reporting violations of the TNC's required policy of zero tolerance for a participating driver's use of drugs or alcohol.
2. Requires that a TNC immediately suspend a participating driver who is the subject of a complaint described above, investigate the complaint, and maintain all records of the investigation for at least two years. Those requirements currently apply only with respect to complaints alleging violations of a TNC's zero tolerance drug and alcohol policy.
3. Requires a TNC to inform the Department of Safety and Professional Services of each complaint the TNC receives with respect to a subject matter covered by the complaint procedures required under the bill and under current law. The TNC must also inform DSPS once a complaint is resolved.
4. Requires each participating driver to prominently display a copy of his or her driver's license and a copy of the TNC's complaint procedures in the participating driver's vehicle.
5. Requires a TNC to have a third party conduct a criminal background check for each individual applying to be a participating driver for the TNC. Currently, a TNC has the option to conduct the criminal background check itself.
6. Raises the potential monetary penalty from $1,000 to $5,000 for a TNC violating laws governing transportation network services and from $1,000 to $2,500 for all other persons violating those laws.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.
Who's behind it
6 senators are its . All 6 are Democrats.
10 more lawmakers .
See all 16 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (10)
- Jimmy Anderson · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Taylor · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Melissa Sargent · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Don Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Apr 1, 2020
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jun 24, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 6, 2019
Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection.
-
Jun 6, 2019
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 6, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Larson, Risser, Bewley, Hansen, Smith and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Subeck, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Sargent, Considine, Anderson, Vruwink, Skowronski, Fields and Spreitzer
- Jun 6, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection
- Jun 24, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate