Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental District Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter. (FE)
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill increases the maximum life from 20 to 25 years, the expenditure period
from 15 to 20 years, and the tax increment allocation period from 20 to 25 years for
Tax Incremental District Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter.
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district in part of its territory to foster development under
certain conditions. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create
a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or
village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing
costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the
allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23
years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year
in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally
make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended
termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the
expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Under this bill, with regard to TID Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter,
the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 20 years after the TID was
created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 25 years after the TID's creation,
and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 5 years.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Sep 12, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 17, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 17, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Aye · 33
- Alberta Darling (8)
- André Jacque (1)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Kooyenga (5)
- Dan Feyen (20)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- David Craig (28)
- Devin LeMahieu (9)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Howard Marklein (17)
- Janet Bewley (25)
- Janis Ringhand (15)
- Jeff Smith (31)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Kathleen Bernier (23)
- LaTonya Johnson (6)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Patrick Testin (24)
- Patty Schachtner (10)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Roger Roth (19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Steve Nass (11)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Full history
- Jun 7, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representative Spiros
- Jun 7, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade
- Jun 13, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 5, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 12, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 12, 2019 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 12, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 17, 2020 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 17, 2020 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 17, 2020 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-21-2020 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 21, 2020 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 21, 2020 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 21, 2020 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 21, 2020 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Jan 21, 2020 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:33 AM on 2-20-2020 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21
- Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2020 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 25, 2020 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Feb 25, 2020 · Senate
LRB correction
- Feb 28, 2020 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 2-28-2020
- Mar 4, 2020 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2020. 2019 Wisconsin Act 179
- Mar 4, 2020 · Senate
Published 3-4-2020