Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Senate Bill 268

Lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental District Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 4, 2020. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 7, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 20, 2020

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2019 Wisconsin Act 179

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 4, 2020: “Published 3-4-2020”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill increases the maximum life from 20 to 25 years, the expenditure period from 15 to 20 years, and the tax increment allocation period from 20 to 25 years for Tax Incremental District Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a tax incremental district in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Read the full summary

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Under this bill, with regard to TID Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 20 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 25 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 5 years.

Who's behind it

Jerry Petrowski, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Sep 12, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 17, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 17, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Jan 21, 2020

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 4, 2020

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 4, 2020

    The governor signed it. It became 2019 Wisconsin Act 179.

  3. Feb 28, 2020

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 20, 2020

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 18, 2020

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Jan 21, 2020

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Jan 21, 2020

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  8. Jan 17, 2020

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  9. Jan 17, 2020

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Sep 12, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Sep 5, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jun 13, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jun 7, 2019

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade.

  14. Jun 7, 2019

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 7, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representative Spiros

  2. Jun 7, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade

  3. Jun 13, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 5, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 12, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 12, 2019 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Sep 12, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Jan 17, 2020 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Jan 17, 2020 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Jan 17, 2020 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2020 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  15. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:33 AM on 2-20-2020 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21

  19. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 21, 2020 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Feb 25, 2020 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  26. Feb 25, 2020 · Senate

    LRB correction

  27. Feb 28, 2020 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-28-2020

  28. Mar 4, 2020 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2020. 2019 Wisconsin Act 179

  29. Mar 4, 2020 · Senate

    Published 3-4-2020

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote