Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

SB 268

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental District Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter. (FE)

Marathon county Property tax

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill increases the maximum life from 20 to 25 years, the expenditure period

from 15 to 20 years, and the tax increment allocation period from 20 to 25 years for

Tax Incremental District Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district in part of its territory to foster development under

certain conditions. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create

a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several

steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the

proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local

planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed

project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID.

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or

village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing

costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the

allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23

years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year

in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally

make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended

termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the

expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Under this bill, with regard to TID Number Two in the village of Kronenwetter,

the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 20 years after the TID was

created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 25 years after the TID's creation,

and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 5 years.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Petrowski (R)

1 cosponsors

Spiros (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Sep 12, 2019 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 17, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 17, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 7, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representative Spiros

  2. Jun 7, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade

  3. Jun 13, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 5, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 12, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 12, 2019 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Sep 12, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Jan 17, 2020 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Jan 17, 2020 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Jan 17, 2020 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2020 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  15. Jan 21, 2020 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:33 AM on 2-20-2020 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21

  19. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 21, 2020 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Feb 25, 2020 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  26. Feb 25, 2020 · Senate

    LRB correction

  27. Feb 28, 2020 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-28-2020

  28. Mar 4, 2020 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2020. 2019 Wisconsin Act 179

  29. Mar 4, 2020 · Senate

    Published 3-4-2020