Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: holding a referendum to increase a political subdivision's levy limit. (FE)
County — Taxation Municipality — Taxation Referendum Register of deeds
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, with certain exceptions, no political subdivision may
increase its property tax levy in any year by a percentage that exceeds the valuation
factor. The valuation factor is a percentage equal to the greater of either the
percentage change in the political subdivision's January 1 equalized property values
due to new construction (less improvements removed between the previous year and
the current year) or zero percent. One exception allows a political subdivision to
increase its levy limit beyond the amount of the previous year's levy, as increased by
the valuation factor, by adopting a resolution and having the increase approved at
a referendum. The increase may apply for the next fiscal year or on an ongoing basis
Current law prescribes the exact wording of the ballot question. The ballot
question must include the name of the political subdivision and provide a description
of the levy limit that applies to the political subdivision for the next fiscal year. The
ballot question must then ask the elector whether he or she agrees to allow the
political subdivision to exceed the limit by a specified amount, which is also
expressed as a percentage increase from the previous year's levy. The question must
also describe the purpose for which the increase will be used. For any levy in an
odd-numbered year, the political subdivision may call a special referendum to
consider the question. In an even-numbered year, the political subdivision must
hold the referendum at the next spring primary or election or partisan primary or
general election following adoption of the resolution.
This bill allows a political subdivision to use its best estimate of its valuation
factor, based on the most current data available to it, in order to adopt a resolution
and hold a referendum to increase its levy beyond the allowable limit. The political
subdivision may call a special referendum to consider the resolution. Otherwise, the
referendum would be held at the spring primary or election or partisan primary or
general election. The bill does not prescribe the exact wording for the ballot, but
instead provides that the question include the following:
1. The name of the political subdivision to which the levy increase applies.
2. The purpose for which the increase will be used.
3. If the increase is for the next fiscal year only, the percentage increase in the
levy from the previous year's levy and the amount of the increase.
4. If the increase is on an ongoing basis, the amount of the increase for each
fiscal year for which the increase applies.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Dec 19, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Dec 19, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Dec 19, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 21, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Marklein, Bewley, Testin and Bernier; cosponsored by Representatives Novak, Shankland, Considine, Edming, Kitchens, Milroy, Quinn, Rohrkaste, Sargent, Sinicki, Spiros, Snyder, Spreitzer, Swearingen and Skowronski
- Jun 21, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions
- Jul 2, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 12, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein
- Aug 20, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Aug 28, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Risser
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 15, 2019 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein
- Dec 18, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Dec 19, 2019 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Dec 19, 2019 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Dec 19, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Dec 19, 2019 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 19, 2020 · Senate
Senator Larson added as a coauthor
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1