Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Senate Bill 292

Notices of eligibility to receive a prize

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 4, 2020. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 21, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2019

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 20, 2020

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 4, 2020.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 12, 2020: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill eliminates several requirements and prohibitions that apply to a person who represents that an individual has been selected or may be eligible to receive a prize. Under current law, a person who represents to an individual that the individual has been selected or may be eligible to receive a prize is prohibited from requesting or accepting payment from the individual before the individual receives a written prize notice that contains certain information, such as the verifiable retail value of the prize, the odds of receiving the prize, and a description of any requirement for the individual to view or hear a sales presentation in order to claim the prize. This bill exempts a person who represents that a uniform prize will be delivered to each individual who responds and satisfies conditions described in the representation from that prohibition and those requirements.

The bill also makes the following changes regarding prize notices:

Read the full summary

1. Eliminates the prohibition under current law against placing on an envelope containing a prize notice a representation that the addressee of the envelope has been selected or may be eligible to receive a prize.

2. Provides that the verifiable retail value of a prize and the odds of receiving a prize must be stated on the first page of a prize notice. Current law requires the verifiable retail value and odds of receiving a prize to be stated in the immediate proximity of each place that the prize appears throughout a prize notice.

3. Eliminates the requirement under current law that the odds of receiving a prize be stated in the form of the number of prizes awarded out of the total number of prize notices distributed.

4. Also eliminates the requirement that a description of a restriction that applies to a prize and a description of a limitation on eligibility for a prize be stated by using boldface type in a prize notice.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (5)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Oct 3, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 12, 2020

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 4, 2020

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Feb 28, 2020

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 20, 2020

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 18, 2020

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Nov 6, 2019

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Nov 5, 2019

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Oct 3, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  9. Sep 24, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Jun 21, 2019

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection.

  11. Jun 21, 2019

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 21, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators LeMahieu, Hansen, Marklein, Nass and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Tittl, Vorpagel, Katsma, Skowronski and Steffen

  2. Jun 21, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Sep 24, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 3, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Oct 3, 2019 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  6. Oct 3, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Nov 1, 2019 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Read a second time

  9. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  11. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Nov 6, 2019 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  14. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  15. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:35 AM on 2-20-2020 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 21

  16. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  20. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 21, 2020 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  22. Feb 25, 2020 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  23. Feb 28, 2020 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 2-28-2020

  24. Mar 4, 2020 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-3-2020

  25. May 12, 2020 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2020 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  26. May 12, 2020 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote