Senate Bill 391
Lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental Districts Number Three and Four in the village of Lake Delton. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Nov 13, 2019. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 13, 2019
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 29 to 4
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Oct 10, 2019
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2019 Wisconsin Act 21
Latest entry in the official record, Nov 13, 2019: “Published 11-14-2019”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill increases the maximum life, the expenditure period, and the tax increment allocation period for Tax Incremental Districts Number Three and Four in the village of Lake Delton.
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a TID in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions.
Read the full summary Show less
Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Under the bill, with regard to TID Number Three in the village of Lake Delton, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 17 years.
Also under the bill, with regard to TID Number Four in the village of Lake Delton, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 10 years.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Republicans.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 6 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Tony Kurtz · Republican, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 3, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Oct 4, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Oct 4, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 29 to 4 · Oct 8, 2019
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (29)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Patty Schachtner (D, 10)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (4)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Nov 13, 2019
The new law was published.
-
Nov 13, 2019
The governor signed it. It became 2019 Wisconsin Act 21.
-
Nov 11, 2019
Sent to the governor.
-
Oct 10, 2019
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Oct 8, 2019
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 8, 2019
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 8, 2019
The Senate passed it, 29 to 4.
-
Oct 4, 2019
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Oct 4, 2019
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 3, 2019
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 1, 2019
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 23, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 13, 2019
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Sep 13, 2019
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade.
-
Sep 13, 2019
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 13, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Olsen and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Kurtz and Tusler
- Sep 13, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade
- Sep 13, 2019 · Senate
Representative Skowronski added as a cosponsor
- Sep 23, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 1, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 2, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 3, 2019 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 3, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 4, 2019 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Oct 4, 2019 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Oct 4, 2019 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-8-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-10-2019 by Committee on Rules
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 11, 2019 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Oct 15, 2019 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 11, 2019 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-11-2019
- Nov 13, 2019 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 11-13-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 21
- Nov 13, 2019 · Senate
Published 11-14-2019
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote