Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental Districts Number Three and Four in the village of Lake Delton. (FE)
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill increases the maximum life, the expenditure period, and the tax
increment allocation period for Tax Incremental Districts Number Three and Four
in the village of Lake Delton.
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a TID in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions.
Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under
certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and
plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed
TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning
commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project
plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or
village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing
costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the
allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23
years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year
in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally
make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended
termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the
expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Under the bill, with regard to TID Number Three in the village of Lake Delton,
the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID was
created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's creation,
and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 17 years.
Also under the bill, with regard to TID Number Four in the village of Lake
Delton, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the
TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's
creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 10 years.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 3, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Oct 4, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Oct 4, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Aye · 29
- Alberta Darling (8)
- André Jacque (1)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Kooyenga (5)
- Dan Feyen (20)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Devin LeMahieu (9)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Howard Marklein (17)
- Janet Bewley (25)
- Janis Ringhand (15)
- Jeff Smith (31)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Kathleen Bernier (23)
- LaTonya Johnson (6)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Patrick Testin (24)
- Patty Schachtner (10)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Roger Roth (19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Nay · 4
- David Craig (28)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Steve Nass (11)
Full history
- Sep 13, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Olsen and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Kurtz and Tusler
- Sep 13, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade
- Sep 13, 2019 · Senate
Representative Skowronski added as a cosponsor
- Sep 23, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 1, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 2, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 3, 2019 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 3, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 4, 2019 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-8-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 4, 2019 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Oct 4, 2019 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4
- Oct 8, 2019 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-10-2019 by Committee on Rules
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 11, 2019 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Oct 15, 2019 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 11, 2019 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-11-2019
- Nov 13, 2019 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 11-13-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 21
- Nov 13, 2019 · Senate
Published 11-14-2019