Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Senate Bill 391

Lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental Districts Number Three and Four in the village of Lake Delton. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 13, 2019. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 13, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 29 to 4

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 10, 2019

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2019 Wisconsin Act 21

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 13, 2019: “Published 11-14-2019”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill increases the maximum life, the expenditure period, and the tax increment allocation period for Tax Incremental Districts Number Three and Four in the village of Lake Delton.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a TID in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions.

Read the full summary

Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Under the bill, with regard to TID Number Three in the village of Lake Delton, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 17 years.

Also under the bill, with regard to TID Number Four in the village of Lake Delton, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 10 years.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 3, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Oct 4, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Oct 4, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 29 to 4 · Oct 8, 2019

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 13, 2019

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 13, 2019

    The governor signed it. It became 2019 Wisconsin Act 21.

  3. Nov 11, 2019

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Oct 10, 2019

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Oct 8, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Oct 8, 2019

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Oct 8, 2019

    The Senate passed it, 29 to 4.

  8. Oct 4, 2019

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  9. Oct 4, 2019

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Oct 3, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Oct 1, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Sep 23, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Sep 13, 2019

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Sep 13, 2019

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade.

  15. Sep 13, 2019

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 13, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Olsen and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Kurtz and Tusler

  2. Sep 13, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade

  3. Sep 13, 2019 · Senate

    Representative Skowronski added as a cosponsor

  4. Sep 23, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 1, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 2, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 3, 2019 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Oct 3, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Oct 4, 2019 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  10. Oct 4, 2019 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  11. Oct 4, 2019 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-8-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4

  16. Oct 8, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Oct 8, 2019 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-10-2019 by Committee on Rules

  20. Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  21. Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Oct 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Oct 11, 2019 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Oct 15, 2019 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Nov 11, 2019 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-11-2019

  29. Nov 13, 2019 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-13-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 21

  30. Nov 13, 2019 · Senate

    Published 11-14-2019

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote