Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

SB 40

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the provision by employers to employees of written disclosure statements of the terms of employment, various changes pertaining to wage claims, occupational or professional licensing of employers that owe wages under wage claim judgments, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Attorney — Fee Court — Fee Court — Procedure Employment Limitation of action State agencies Trades and occupations Wage Workforce development department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill 1) makes various changes relating to claims that an employer has not

paid an employee wages that the employer owes to the employee (wage claims); 2)

requires employers to provide terms of employment statements to employees and

specifies penalties for employers that fail to provide or comply with the statement;

and 3) prohibits state agencies from issuing credentials or credential renewals to

employers with unpaid wage claims against them.

Wage claims

Current law

Filing and investigation; statute of limitations.

Under current law, an

employee who has a claim that his or her employer has not paid the employee any

wages that are owed to the employee may either 1) file the wage claim with the

Department of Workforce Development, which may attempt to settle and

compromise the wage claim or commence an action in circuit court against the

employer on the employee's behalf to collect the wage claim; or 2) commence an action

in circuit court on his or her own behalf to collect the wage claim without first filing

a wage claim with DWD. An action in circuit court to collect a wage claim must be

commenced no later than two years after the wage claim is filed with DWD or, if the

wage claim is not first filed with DWD, no later than two years after the cause of

action accrues (statute of limitations). DWD may investigate a wage claim only if it

is filed no later than two years after the wages are due.

Increased wages.

Under current law, if a wage claim action is commenced in

circuit court before DWD has completed its attempt to settle and compromise the

claim, the circuit court may order the employer to pay, in addition to the amount of

wages unpaid, increased wages of not more than 50 percent of the amount of wages

unpaid. If a wage claim action is commenced in circuit court after DWD has

completed its attempt to settle and compromise the claim, the circuit court may order

the employer to pay, in addition to the amount of wages unpaid, increased wages of

not more than 100 percent of the amount of wages unpaid.

The bill

Filing and investigation; statute of limitations.

This bill allows an

employee to file a wage claim with DWD or to commence a wage claim action in circuit

court not only on his or her own behalf but also on behalf of other employees similarly

situated who consent in writing to being parties to the claim or action. The bill also

increases the statute of limitations for a wage claim action to four years after the

wage claim is filed with DWD or, if the wage claim is not first filed with DWD, to four

years after the cause of action accrues and permits DWD to investigate a wage claim

that is filed no later than four years after the wages are due.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Hansen (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Miller (D) , Ringhand (D) , Risser (D) , Smith (D) , Wirch (D)

7 cosponsors

Anderson (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Sargent (D) , Sinicki and Spreitzer , Subeck (D)

Full history

  1. Feb 15, 2019 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wirch, Carpenter, Hansen, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Smith and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Ohnstad, Bowen, Anderson, Brostoff, Sargent and Subeck

  2. Feb 15, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform

  3. Mar 1, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 4, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 14, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 20, 2019 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 16, 2019 · Senate

    Representatives Sinicki and Spreitzer added as cosponsors

  8. Sep 26, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Apr 1, 2020 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1