Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: farmland preservation implementation grants, agreements, and tax credits and making an appropriation. (FE)
Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Farmland preservation
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes the following changes involving farmland preservation
implementation grants and agreements and farmland preservation tax credits:
1. Decreases the minimum required length of a farmland preservation
agreement between the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
and a farmland owner to 10 years from 15 years. Under current law, farmland
owners who enter into a farmland preservation agreement with DATCP may be
eligible to receive farmland preservation tax credits for their qualifying acres of
farmland.
2. Requires DATCP to include in a report submitted to the Board of Agriculture,
Trade and Consumer Protection, the Joint Committee on Finance, the standing
committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over agriculture, the Department of
Revenue, and the Department of Administration a review of the tax credit amounts
for qualifying acres for the farmland preservation tax credit and recommendations
for the tax credit levels for qualifying acres of farmland. Current law requires
DATCP to submit a report about farmland and the farmland preservation program
once every two years to the board, DOR, and DOA.
3. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $7.50 to $10.00
the amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are
located in a farmland preservation zoning district but are not subject to a farmland
preservation agreement.
4. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $5.00 to $10.00
the amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are
subject to a farmland preservation agreement but not located in a farmland
preservation zoning district.
5. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $10.00 to $12.50
the amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are
located in a farmland preservation zoning district and are subject to a farmland
preservation agreement.
6. Adds a new category of farmland that qualifies for the farmland preservation
tax credit. A credit of $10 per acre may be claimed for farmland that is located in a
farmland preservation area, but only to the extent that the acres are covered by an
agriculture conservation easement.
7. Authorizes DATCP to award grants to cities, villages, towns, counties,
regional planning commissions, and tribal governments for various purposes related
to implementing a county's certified farmland preservation plan. Under the bill,
DATCP must enter into a contract with a grant recipient before distributing grant
funds, and the contract must identify costs eligible for reimbursement through the
grant for the following activities: 1) certifying a farmland preservation zoning
ordinance for the first time; 2) enrolling land in farmland preservation agreements;
3) designating an agricultural enterprise area or facilitating agricultural
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: L. Taylor (D) , Schachtner (D) , Smith (D) , Testin (R)
26 cosponsors
Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Cabrera (D) , Considine (D) , Doyle (D) , Emerson (D) , Gruszynski (D) , Kitchens (R) , Kolste (D) , Krug (R) , Kulp (R) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Ramthun (R) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Summerfield (R) , Tranel (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Vruwink (D)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Feb 13, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 22, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Testin, Schachtner, Smith and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Oldenburg, Spreitzer, Novak, Kolste, Tranel, Shankland, Bowen, Cabrera, Considine, Doyle, Emerson, Gruszynski, Kitchens, Krug, Kulp, Mursau, Neubauer, Ramthun, Schraa, Skowronski, Subeck, Summerfield, C. Taylor, Tusler, VanderMeer and Vruwink
- Nov 22, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions
- Dec 9, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 6, 2020 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 7, 2020 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 13, 2020 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 13, 2020 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 13, 2020 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1