Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Senate Bill 673

Various changes to the worker's compensation law and making an appropriation. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 8, 2020

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to the worker's compensation law, as administered by the Department of Workforce Development and the Division of Hearings and Appeals in the Department of Administration (DHA).

Payment of benefits; other payments Liability for public safety officers This bill makes changes to the conditions of liability for worker's compensation benefits for a law enforcement officer or a fire fighter (public safety officer) who is diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that if a public safety officer is diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder by a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist and the mental injury that resulted in that diagnosis is not accompanied by a physical injury, that public safety officer can bring a claim for worker's compensation benefits if the conditions of liability are proven by a preponderance of the evidence and the mental injury is not the result of a good-faith employment action by the person's employer. Under the bill, such an injured public safety employee is not required to demonstrate a diagnosis based on unusual stress of greater dimensions than the day-to-day emotional strain and tension experienced by all employees as required under School District No. 1 v. DILHR , 62 Wis. 2d 370, 215 N.W.2d 373 (1974).

The bill also limits liability for treatment for a mental injury that is compensable under the bill's provisions to no more than 32 weeks after the injury is first reported.

Payments in cases of injuries resulting in death Current law provides that, in each case of an injury resulting in death leaving no person dependent for support or leaving one or more persons partially dependent for support, the employer or insurer must pay into the work injury supplemental benefit fund (WISBF) the amount of the death benefit otherwise payable. This bill does the following:

1. Allows such amounts due to be paid in advance of when they would otherwise be due, including as a single, lump-sum payment. If an employer or insurer makes an advance or lump-sum payment, the bill requires DWD to give the employer or the insurer an interest credit, computed as otherwise provided under current law.

Current law requires, in the case of a death leaving no dependents, that the payments be made in five equal annual installments.

2. Provides that, in the case of a violation of an employer policy against drug or alcohol use that is causal to an employee's injury resulting in death who leaves no person dependent for support or leaving one or more persons partially dependent for support, no payment is required to be made to WISBF. Current law provides that, in the case of such a violation, then neither the employee nor the employee's dependents may receive any compensation under the worker's compensation law for that injury, other than costs for treating the injury, but does not exempt the employer or insurer from the payment to WISBF.

Furnishing of billing statements This bill requires a health care provider to furnish to the representative or agent of a worker's compensation insurer a complete billing statement for treatment of an injury for which an employee claims compensation upon request. The bill provides that a health care provider may not charge for the copy of the billing statement and that if the provider does not comply with the request within 30 days, the insurer is not liable to the provider for payment for the services that were billed on the requested statement.

Payment of proceeds of claims against third parties Current law provides that when an employee sustains a work injury or dies as a result of a work injury and the employee, the employee's personal representative, or other person entitled to bring action maintains an action in tort against a third party for the injury or death, the proceeds of the claim are to be divided pursuant to a formula detailed under current law. Under that formula, after deducting the reasonable cost of collection, one-third of the remainder is in all cases to be paid to the injured employee, personal representative, or other person entitled. Current law also provides that if an injured employee or dependent receives compensation from the employee's employer or a third party in such an action and the employee received payments from DWD due to the employer being an uninsured employer, the employee or dependent must reimburse DWD for the full amount up to the amount recovered from the third party.

This bill modifies the latter provision such that if an injured employee or dependent receives compensation from the employee's employer or a third party in such an action and the employee received payments from DWD due to the employer being an uninsured employer, the employee or dependent must reimburse DWD in accordance with the formula described above.

Coverage; liability Leased employees Under current law, employee leasing companies are generally liable for injuries to their leased employees under the worker's compensation law. This bill provides that a client of an employee leasing company may instead assume the liability for leased employees under an employee leasing agreement. The bill also provides that if a client terminates or otherwise does not provide worker's compensation insurance coverage for the leased employees, the employee leasing company is liable for injuries to those leased employees under the worker's compensation law.

Employers subject to worker's compensation law Under current law, every person who usually employs three or more employees for services performed in this state is subject to the worker's compensation law. This bill provides that every person who at any time employs three or more employees for services performed in this state is subject to the worker's compensation law and specifies that a person becomes subject to that law on the day on which the person employs three or more employees for services performed in this state.

Statute of limitations This bill clarifies that for worker's compensation claims the statute of limitations applies to an individual's employer, the employer's insurance company, and any other named party.

Long-term care providers; clarification The bill makes clarifications regarding individuals who perform services for persons receiving long-term care benefits under certain long-term care programs and who do not otherwise have worker's compensation coverage for those services to confirm that they are considered to be employees, for worker's compensation purposes, of the entities providing financial management services for the persons receiving the benefits.

Program administration Authority to conduct hearings Under current law, DWD performs various administrative and adjudicatory functions relating to worker's compensation, except that the adjudicatory functions of DWD relating to disputed worker's compensation claims are performed by DHA.

This bill transfers the adjudicatory functions of DHA relating to disputed worker's compensation claims to DWD.

Confidential records; disclosure to certain agencies Under current law, subject to a number of exceptions, certain records of DWD, DHA, or the Labor and Industry Review Commission that reveal information about injured employees are confidential and not subject to disclosure under the public records law or a subpoena. The bill creates another exception for records requested by the Department of Health Services, a county department of social services, or a county department of human services, if the request is limited to the name and address of the employee who is the subject of the record, the name and address of the employee's employer, and any financial information about that employee contained in the record.

Disclosure of records This bill conforms state law to the exemption from federal medical privacy laws for administration of worker's compensation claims. The federal privacy regulations allow a health care provider to disclose without authorization from the patient protected health information as authorized by and to the extent necessary to comply with worker's compensation laws.

Other changes The bill makes various other changes regarding the administration of the worker's compensation law, including 1) adjustments to appropriations and position authority; and 2) changes regarding the financing of the worker's compensation program, including creating a separate appropriation to pay for certain reimbursements for supplemental benefit payments.

Who's behind it

The Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform introduced it.

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 1, 2020

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 22, 2020

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jan 8, 2020

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.

  4. Jan 8, 2020

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 8, 2020 · Senate

    Introduced by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, by request of Department of Workforce Development

  2. Jan 8, 2020 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform

  3. Jan 22, 2020 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 1, 2020 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate