Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: requiring persons accused of violating traffic laws and ordinances related to driving while intoxicated to appear in person in court. (FE)
Court — Fee Court — Procedure Drunken driving Eau claire county Motor vehicle — Regulation Ordinance
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill requires a person who receives a citation for a civil traffic violation
related to operating while intoxicated to appear in court to respond to the charge.
Under current law, generally, a first violation of operating a vehicle while under
the influence of an intoxicant, with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled
substance in one's blood, or with a prohibited alcohol concentration (OWI-related
violation), is a traffic violation punishable by a civil forfeiture. Current law allows
local units of government to enact ordinances in conformity with the state traffic law
that punishes most first OWI-related offenses as a civil violation.
Under current law, a person who receives a citation for an OWI-related civil
traffic violation or who receives a citation for an ordinance in conformity with the
OWI-related traffic violation may opt to appear in court to plead not guilty to the
violation or may opt to pay the forfeiture associated with the violation and avoid an
appearance in court. Generally, a person who pays the forfeiture associated with the
violation is considered to have pled guilty or no contest to the charge.
Under this bill, a person who receives a citation for an OWI-related civil traffic
violation or who receives a citation for an ordinance in conformity therewith is
required to appear in court to plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty to the charge. If
the person fails to appear in court, the court is required to enter a default judgment
against the person and impose the applicable penalties and a $300 surcharge for the
person's failure to appear.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Sep 25, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Sep 25, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 29, 2019 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Bernier, Carpenter, Jacque, Kooyenga, Larson, Marklein and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Ott, Anderson, Horlacher, Quinn, Sortwell, Spiros and Wichgers
- Jan 29, 2019 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Feb 25, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 28, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 4, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 20, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 10, 2019 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 13, 2019 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling
- Jun 19, 2019 · Senate
Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor
- Sep 4, 2019 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 25, 2019 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 25, 2019 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 25, 2019 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 25, 2019 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1