Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: termination of parental rights if a child has been placed outside the home for 15 of the last 22 months. (FE)
Children — Protection and services
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill expands the termination of parental rights (TPR) ground based on a
child's continuing need of protection or services.
Current law provides various grounds for an involuntary TPR, including
continuing need of protection or services, which must be established by proving 1)
that the child has been adjudged to be a child or juvenile in need of protection or
services (CHIPS) and placed, or continued in a placement, outside the child's home
pursuant to one or more orders of the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under
the Children's Code (juvenile court); 2) that the agency responsible for the care of the
child has made a reasonable effort to provide the services ordered by the juvenile
court; and 3) that the child has been outside the home for a cumulative total period
of six months or longer, the parent has failed to meet the conditions established for
the safe return of the child to the home, and there is a substantial likelihood that the
parent will not meet those conditions by the time the child has been placed outside
the home for 15 of the last 22 months.
Under the bill, the involuntary TPR ground of continuing need of protection or
services may also be established by proving that a child has been placed outside of
his or her home on a continuing CHIPS order for 15 of the last 22 months and that
a review panel or court has not, in the 22 months prior to the filing of the TPR
petition, found that the agency failed to make reasonable efforts to achieve a
permanency goal. Under the bill, if the child is an Indian child, the petitioner must
also show that continued custody of the Indian child by the Indian child's parent or
Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the
Indian child and that active efforts have been made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian child's family but those efforts have proved to be unsuccessful.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Jan 29, 2020 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Olsen and Cowles; cosponsored by Representatives Snyder, Kulp, Dittrich, Felzkowski, Horlacher, James, Katsma, Kerkman, Kurtz, Magnafici, Milroy, Murphy, Ramthun, Tusler, Tranel, Thiesfeldt, VanderMeer, Tittl and Edming
- Jan 29, 2020 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts
- Feb 7, 2020 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2020 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1