Senate Bill 729
Grounds for finding a child in need of protection or services or for terminating parental rights, right to a jury trial in a termination of parental rights proceeding, and permanency plan reviews. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 29, 2020
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill changes the grounds for finding that a child is in need of protection or services under the Children's Code and for involuntarily terminating parental rights (TPR), eliminates the right to a jury trial in a TPR proceeding, and changes the process for permanency plan reviews under the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code.
Grounds for CHIPS Under current law, the juvenile court is assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the Children's Code and has exclusive original jurisdiction over a child who is alleged to be in need of protection or services (CHIPS) if certain grounds relating to the child or his or her circumstances are met. The bill creates a new ground for CHIPS when a child is found to be a drug-affected child. Under the bill, a drug-affected child is a child who suffered prenatal exposure to a controlled substance or alcohol or a child whose basic needs and safety have been adversely affected by a parent's or guardian's chronic and severe use of alcohol or a controlled substance.
Read the full summary Show less
Grounds for TPR Under current law, in a proceeding for involuntary TPR, the juvenile court must determine whether grounds for TPR exist. Current law grounds for TPR include 1) continuing need of protection or services if a child is placed outside the home for 15 of the last 22 months under a court order; or 2) a continuing denial of periods of physical placement or visitation if a court order denying physical placement or visitation has been in place for one year. Under current law, the timeline for both of these grounds begins when a court order is entered in a CHIPS or juvenile in need of protection or services (JIPS) proceeding. Under the bill, the timeline for these grounds can also begin when the court enters an order for temporary custody, when a child or juvenile is placed outside the home under a consent decree, or when a court-approved permanency plan places a child outside the home.
The bill creates a new ground for involuntary TPR when the child is a drug-affected child, which is established by showing all of the following:
1. That the child has been found to be a drug-affected child in a CHIPS proceeding.
2. That the parent has not made reasonable efforts to enroll in a substance use disorder treatment or recovery program within 90 days of the placement of the child outside the home under a CHIPS order, or, if the parent enrolled in a substance use disorder treatment or recovery program, that the parent has not maintained substantial compliance with the program.
3. That the parent is not participating in a drug court program.
4. That there is a substantial likelihood that the parent will not meet the conditions for the safe return of the child to the home by the date established at the child's most recent permanency review panel or hearing.
The bill also creates a new ground for TPR based on parental incarceration, which must be established by proving 1) that the child has been adjudged to be in need of protection or services and placed, or continued in a placement, outside the child's home pursuant to one or more court orders containing notice of the grounds for TPR and the conditions necessary for the child to be returned to the home; 2) that the parent is incarcerated at the time of the fact-finding hearing; and 3) that the parent is likely to continue to be incarcerated for a substantial period of the child's minority. In determining whether the parent is likely to be incarcerated for a substantial period of the child's minority, the court may consider a parent's history of repeated incarceration.
Right to a jury trial Under current law, in a TPR proceeding, the juvenile court must hold a fact-finding hearing to determine if there are grounds for TPR. Under current law, any party to a TPR proceeding whose rights may be affected by the TPR order may demand a jury trial for this fact-finding hearing. The bill eliminates the right to a jury trial for the fact-finding hearing.
Permanency plan reviews Under current law, within six months after a child is removed from his or her home in a proceeding under the Children's Code or the Juvenile Justice Code and every 12 months after, the permanency plan is reviewed by the juvenile court or by a panel that is appointed by the juvenile court or by a child welfare agency. Within six months of the initial review and every 12 months after, the permanency plan is reviewed in a hearing before the juvenile court. Under the bill, the initial six-month review and the reviews done every 12 months after are done in a hearing before the juvenile court.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Republicans.
15 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (15)
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Jesse James · Republican, Senate
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Tony Kurtz · Republican, Assembly
- Gae Magnafici · Republican, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Timothy Ramthun · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Apr 1, 2020
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 18, 2020
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 29, 2020
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts.
-
Jan 29, 2020
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 29, 2020 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Dittrich, Murphy, Felzkowski, James, Kulp, Kurtz, Magnafici, Milroy, Ramthun, Tusler, Tranel, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Edming and Snyder
- Jan 29, 2020 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts
- Feb 18, 2020 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate