Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Senate Bill 809

Creating a sexual assault victim bill of rights; collection and reporting of data regarding sexual assault kits; storage and processing of sexual assault kits; tracking of sexual assault kits in sexual assault cases; and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 12, 2020

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Processing of sexual assault kits Under current law, there is no statutory procedure for the collection and processing of sexual assault kits. This bill creates procedures for transmission, processing, and storage of sexual assault kits. Under the bill, a health care professional who collects a sexual assault kit must do one of the following: 1) if the victim chooses to report the sexual assault to law enforcement, the health care professional must notify a law enforcement agency within 24 hours of collecting the kit; or 2) if the victim chooses not to report the sexual assault to law enforcement, the health care professional must send the kit to the state crime laboratories for storage no more than two business days after collecting the kit. Under the bill, if a law enforcement agency has been notified by a health care professional that a kit has been collected, the law enforcement agency must take possession of the kit within 48 hours, and must then send the kit to the state crime laboratories for processing no less than 48 hours and no more than seven days after taking possession of it. If the victim changes his or her mind about wanting to have his or her kit analyzed after it is given to a law enforcement agency but before the agency sends the kit to the state crime laboratories for processing, the agency must send the kit to the state crime laboratories for storage rather than for processing.

Under the bill, once the state crime laboratories takes possession of a sexual assault kit, it must do one of the following: 1) if it has received the kit of a person who has not consented to analysis, securely store the kit for 50 years; or 2) if it has received the kit of a person who has consented to analysis, process the kit within 90 days and then securely store the kit for 50 years, until the date of the expiration of the statute of limitations, or until the end of a term of imprisonment or probation of a person convicted in the sexual assault case, whichever is longest.

Read the full summary

Sexual assault victim bill of rights This bill creates a sexual assault victim bill of rights. In addition to the rights extended to crime victims under Wisconsin's basic bill of rights for victims and witnesses, this bill adds the following rights for victims of sexual assault, regardless of whether or not they choose to cooperate with a law enforcement agency: the right to be provided with accurate written information about his or her rights as a sexual assault victim; the right to bathe immediately following a sexual assault forensic examination; the right to choose whether or not to cooperate with a law enforcement agency; the right to have any sexual assault kit stored for 50 years or until the end of the prison term of the person convicted of the assault against him or her; and the right to be notified in writing of the results of his or her sexual assault kit analysis, to be notified in writing of the occurrence of analysis of another sexual assault kit in which there is a matching DNA sample collected, and to be notified in writing 60 days prior to the destruction of any evidence obtained in a sexual assault forensic examination.

Sexual assault data Under current law, local law enforcement agencies must report certain crime statistics to the Department of Justice. This bill requires DOJ to collect certain data regarding sexual assault kits collected and tested in Wisconsin in addition to the data currently being collected, and requires DOJ to submit an annual report to the legislature on those sexual assault kits. Under the bill, DOJ must report specific information including the following: the number of sexual assault kits collected and the dates of collection, the number of sexual assault kits submitted to DOJ laboratories for analysis, the number of kits submitted to DOJ laboratories for analysis that have not yet been analyzed and the reason they have not been analyzed, the dates of submission and, if applicable, analysis, and the number of kits not submitted to DOJ for analysis that remain in law enforcement custody and the reason the kits were not submitted. The bill also requires DOJ to publish data on law enforcement agency compliance with DOJ reporting requirements.

This bill also requires DOJ to establish a data bank, to be known as the Wisconsin Sexual Assault Kit Tracking System, for the purpose of providing a victim of sexual assault access to information about the status of any sexual assault kit the victim has provided.

Citizenship of individuals arrested for and convicted of sexual assault Under the bill, if a person under arrest for sexual assault is not a U.S. citizen and is not authorized to be in the United States under federal law, the law enforcement agency must notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In addition, if a person convicted for sexual assault is not a U.S. citizen and is not authorized to be in the United States under federal law, DOJ must notify U.S.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Parental choice programs; exceptions for victims of sexual assault Under the bill, a pupil who is a victim of sexual assault may attend a private school participating in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program, the Racine Parental Choice Program, or the statewide parental choice program, regardless of whether the pupil meets the standard eligibility requirements to participate in the parental choice program. Additionally, the bill provides an alternative application procedure that allows a pupil who is victim of sexual assault to begin attending a private school under a parental choice program at any time during the school year.

For purposes of these provisions, a pupil is a victim of sexual assault if charges are filed for the sexual assault and the person against whom the charges were filed is a pupil or a school district employee.

Miscellaneous Current law allows a health care provider who conducts an examination to gather evidence regarding a sex offense to apply to DOJ for reimbursement of the examination costs, which include tests for sexually transmitted diseases and medications to prevent or treat a sexually transmitted disease. This bill adds the following as costs that may be reimbursed: 1) if the health care provider believes that pregnancy could be a consequence of the sex offense, the costs of a pregnancy test, to be administered when a pregnancy may be detected and 2) a post-exposure prophylaxis.

The bill also provides authority to a court to require a defendant who is convicted of a crime in which a sexual assault kit was collected to pay the costs for collection of the sexual assault kit and prohibits the sale of at-home sexual assault evidence collection kits.

Who's behind it

André Jacque, a Republican, is its ⁠.

19 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (19)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Apr 1, 2020

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 26, 2020

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Feb 12, 2020

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  4. Feb 12, 2020

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 12, 2020 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Jacque; cosponsored by Representatives Steffen, Thiesfeldt, Brandtjen, James, Loudenbeck, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kerkman, Knodl, Krug, Kulp, Magnafici, Murphy, Mursau, Sanfelippo, Petersen, Quinn, Tittl and Zimmerman

  2. Feb 12, 2020 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Feb 17, 2020 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jacque

  4. Feb 26, 2020 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 1, 2020 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate