Senate Bill 894
Imposing disclosure and billing requirements for certain health care providers, creating an arbitration process, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 19, 2020
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates disclosure, notice, billing, and arbitration requirements for the situation in which an enrollee in a defined network or preferred provider plan (“plan”) may receive services from a health care provider that is not in the plan's network.
Under the bill, a plan must annually provide to enrollees a directory of providers and a list of health care facilities that are in its network. The bill also requires that a provider who is not in the network of the enrollee's plan but is providing a service at an in-network health care facility must disclose that information to the enrollee, provide the enrollee a good faith estimate of the cost of services the enrollee may be responsible for, and inform the enrollee of the availability of arbitration to settle disputes over the cost of services. The health care facility may opt to provide the notice for the provider.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the bill, if an enrollee of a plan requires medically necessary services that are not available from an in-network provider within a reasonable time, then the plan must provide an opportunity for referral to an out-of-network provider. The plan must reimburse the out-of-network provider at the usual and customary rate or at a rate agreed to between the provider and the plan and may not require the enrollee to pay more than the enrollee would have paid had the provider been in the plan's network. If there a dispute over the reimbursement, the plan or provider may submit the dispute using the arbitration process described below. The bill requires the enrollee to provide the out-of-network provider an assignment of benefits for any service, item, or supply provided by that provider.
Similarly, under the bill, if an enrollee of a plan receives emergency services from an out-of-network provider, then the plan must reimburse the provider at the usual and customary rate or at a rate agreed to between the provider and the plan and may not require the enrollee to pay more than the enrollee would have paid if the provider was in the plan's network. If there a dispute over the reimbursement, the plan or provider may submit the dispute using the arbitration process described below.
The bill requires the commissioner of insurance to promulgate rules to establish the arbitration process under which enrollees, plans, and out-of-network providers may submit billing disputes to an independent dispute resolution entity.
Under the bill, an enrollee may request arbitration for a claim if the amount that the enrollee is financially responsible for, after copayments, deductibles, and coinsurance, is more than $500, unless that amount is less than the good faith estimate provided by the provider. The plan or provider may not use the arbitration process to dispute bills for certain emergency services that do not exceed a specified amount or services for which provider fees are subject by law to monetary limitations.
Once a dispute is filed, the independent dispute resolution entity has 30 days to determine a reasonable fee for the services provided to the enrollee by the out-of-network provider. If the dispute is between the plan and provider, each party submits what it thinks is a reasonable fee for the services, and the independent dispute resolution entity must choose one of those amounts. However, if the entity finds that both sides' amounts are unreasonable or that a settlement between the parties is likely, it may direct the plan and provider to attempt a good faith negotiation for settlement and, if they reach an agreement, the entity will select that amount as its final determination. If the dispute is between the enrollee and provider, the independent dispute resolution entity determines a reasonable fee based upon factors that include whether there is a gross disparity between the fee billed by the provider and other fees charged by that provider; the provider's training and experience; and the circumstances and complexity of the particular case. The entity's determination is binding on the parties.
The bill provides that the losing party must pay the costs of the arbitration with two exceptions. First, if a settlement is reached between a plan and provider at the direction of the independent dispute resolution entity, the costs are evenly divided between the parties. Second, if the enrollee is the losing party, the maximum amount the enrollee may be charged is $100 and the commissioner may waive or reduce the charge if requiring full payment would impose a hardship on the enrollee. The bill requires the commissioner to determine and establish a mechanism to cover the arbitration costs that are otherwise unpaid by enrollees.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Democrats.
18 more lawmakers .
See all 20 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (18)
- Jimmy Anderson · Democrat, Assembly
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- David Bowen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Marisabel Cabrera · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Debra Kolste · Democrat, Assembly
- Greta Neubauer · Democrat, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Melissa Sargent · Democrat, Assembly
- Katrina Shankland · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Shelia Stubbs · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Don Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- JoCasta Zamarripa · Democrat, Assembly
What happened
-
Apr 1, 2020
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 19, 2020
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts.
-
Mar 19, 2020
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 19, 2020 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Smith and Larson; cosponsored by Representatives Kolste, Hebl, Zamarripa, Stubbs, Billings, Cabrera, Anderson, Sargent, Subeck, Brostoff, Bowen, Shankland, Neubauer, Sinicki, Considine, Ohnstad, Hintz and Vruwink
- Mar 19, 2020 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Government Oversight and Courts
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor