Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 100

Guardian training requirements

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 18, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 15, 2022: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill establishes initial training requirements for guardians. Under the bill, every proposed guardian of the person must complete training on all of the following topics: 1) the duties and required responsibilities of a guardian under the law and limits of a guardian's decision-making authority; 2) alternatives to guardianship, including supported decision-making and powers of attorney; 3) rights retained by a ward; 4) best practices for a guardian to solicit and understand the wishes and preferences of a ward, involving a ward in decision-making, and taking a ward's wishes and preferences into account in decisions made by the guardian; 5) restoration of a ward's rights and the process for removal of guardianship; 6) future planning and identification of a potential standby or successor guardian; and 7) resources and technical support for guardians. The bill also requires that every proposed guardian of the estate complete training on the duties and responsibilities of a guardian under the law and limits of a guardian's decision-making authority and inventory and accounting requirements. The bill provides limited exemptions to these training requirements for certain corporate guardians, volunteer guardians, and guardians of minors.

Under the bill, a proposed guardian of the person or the estate must submit, prior to permanent guardianship being granted, a sworn and notarized statement to the court that the person has completed the training requirements.

Read the full summary

The bill requires the Department of Health Services to award a grant to administer and conduct the required guardian training. DHS must require, in the request for proposal, that the grantee have expertise in state guardianship law, experience with technical assistance and support to guardians and wards, and knowledge of common challenges and questions encountered by guardians and wards. In addition, the grantee selected to develop training shall develop plain language, web-based online training modules using adult-learning design principles that can be accessed for free by training topic and in formats that maximize accessibility, with printed versions available for free upon request.

Who's behind it

23 lawmakers are its ⁠. 13 are Republicans and 10 are Democrats.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 38 names

Authors (23)

Signed on in support (15)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 21, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Family Law vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 21, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 15, 2022

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 27, 2021

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Oct 21, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Oct 21, 2021

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  5. Apr 27, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Feb 18, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Family Law.

  7. Feb 18, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Zimmerman, Dittrich, J. Rodriguez, B. Meyers, Baldeh, Bowen, Brandtjen, Edming, Gundrum, Hong, Moses, Mursau, Ortiz-Velez, Shankland, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Summerfield, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Vining, Vruwink, Wichgers and Knodl; cosponsored by Senators Jacque, Bernier, Wanggaard, Testin, Johnson, Bewley, Pfaff, Ballweg, Carpenter, Larson, Ringhand, L. Taylor and Wirch

  2. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Apr 27, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. May 4, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Zimmerman

  5. May 5, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  8. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-27-2021 by Committee on Rules

  10. Oct 27, 2021 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Oct 27, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  12. Oct 27, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Tittl added as a coauthor

  13. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote