Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 102

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: judicial notice of certain court records relating to domestic violence or child abuse.

Children — Abuse and neglect Court — Procedure Family

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill allows a court in an action affecting the family to take judicial notice

of certain records relating to domestic violence.

Under current law, certain aspects of family law proceedings are modified if a

court finds that a parent has engaged in a pattern or serious incident of interspousal

battery or domestic abuse. If a guardian ad litem is appointed for a child in an action

affecting the family, the guardian ad litem is required to investigate whether there

is evidence that either parent engaged in interspousal battery or domestic abuse and

must report the results of the investigation to the court.

The bill specifies that in a family law action in which the parties have a minor

child, a court may take judicial notice of records available on the Internet site of the

consolidated court automation programs, commonly referred to as CCAP, relating to

certain convictions and restraining orders between the parties. Under the bill, the

court may take judicial notice of records available on CCAP relating to 1) a conviction

of a parent for a crime that is subject to the statutory domestic abuse surcharge and

is committed against the other parent, including battery, stalking, sexual assault,

damage to property, disorderly conduct, and other specified crimes; 2) a conviction

of a parent for a crime against a child that is committed against a child of the parties;

or 3) an injunction issued against a parent if the injunction was requested by the

other parent, for a domestic abuse or harassment restraining order.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Brooks (R) , Dittrich (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Skowronski (R) , Tusler (R) , Wichgers (R)

2 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Jacque (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 May 14, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Armstrong, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Kuglitsch, Murphy, Mursau, Skowronski, Tusler and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Ballweg

  2. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Apr 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 27, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. May 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  6. May 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Jun 16, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-22-2021 by Committee on Rules

  8. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  9. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  10. Jun 22, 2021 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  11. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Jun 24, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  15. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1