Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: judicial notice of certain court records relating to domestic violence or child abuse.
Children — Abuse and neglect Court — Procedure Family
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows a court in an action affecting the family to take judicial notice
of certain records relating to domestic violence.
Under current law, certain aspects of family law proceedings are modified if a
court finds that a parent has engaged in a pattern or serious incident of interspousal
battery or domestic abuse. If a guardian ad litem is appointed for a child in an action
affecting the family, the guardian ad litem is required to investigate whether there
is evidence that either parent engaged in interspousal battery or domestic abuse and
must report the results of the investigation to the court.
The bill specifies that in a family law action in which the parties have a minor
child, a court may take judicial notice of records available on the Internet site of the
consolidated court automation programs, commonly referred to as CCAP, relating to
certain convictions and restraining orders between the parties. Under the bill, the
court may take judicial notice of records available on CCAP relating to 1) a conviction
of a parent for a crime that is subject to the statutory domestic abuse surcharge and
is committed against the other parent, including battery, stalking, sexual assault,
damage to property, disorderly conduct, and other specified crimes; 2) a conviction
of a parent for a crime against a child that is committed against a child of the parties;
or 3) an injunction issued against a parent if the injunction was requested by the
other parent, for a domestic abuse or harassment restraining order.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 May 14, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Armstrong, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Kuglitsch, Murphy, Mursau, Skowronski, Tusler and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Ballweg
- Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Apr 15, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 27, 2021 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 14, 2021 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- May 14, 2021 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 16, 2021 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-22-2021 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 22, 2021 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 24, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Mar 15, 2022 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1