Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 107

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: factors relating to the physical placement of a child.

Court — Procedure Family — Support

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, in an action affecting a family that involves a child, the court

is required to determine the legal custody and the physical placement of the child.

Current law requires the court to set a physical placement schedule that allows a

child to have regularly occurring, meaningful periods of physical placement with

each parent and that maximizes the amount of time for a child with each parent. In

determining a physical placement schedule, a court must, in each case, consider a

statutory list of best-interest factors.

This bill specifies that if a court grants less than 25 percent of physical

placement to one parent in a temporary or final order in an action affecting the

family, specific findings of fact must be entered as to the reason greater physical

placement with that parent is not in the best interest of the child.

The bill also reorganizes the statutory best-interest factors, removing two

considerations: the stability in placement and availability of child care services. The

bill also specifies that the factors are not necessarily listed in order of importance.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Brandtjen (R) , Brooks (R) , Dittrich (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Skowronski (R) , Spiros (R) , Tusler (R) , Wichgers (R)

4 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Nass (R) , Wimberger (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 6, Noes 3

Passed 6–3 Mar 25, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Skowronski, Tusler, Wichgers and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Bernier, Ballweg, Wimberger and Nass

  2. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Mar 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 17, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 25, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  6. Mar 25, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. May 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 by Committee on Rules

  8. May 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  9. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1