Assembly Bill 143
Qualified residential treatment programs and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on May 21, 2021. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 5, 2021
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed May 11, 2021
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed May 11, 2021
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2021 Wisconsin Act 42
Latest entry in the official record, May 21, 2021: “Published 5-22-2021”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill allows for the certification of qualified residential treatment programs and establishes certain procedures that apply when a child is placed in one.
This bill allows the Department of Children and Families to certify a residential care center for children and youth, group home, or shelter care facility to operate a qualified residential treatment program (QRTP) if it determines that the program meets the federal requirements for such a program to receive Title IV-E child welfare funding and DCF's requirements for such a program. The bill allows DCF to monitor compliance with certification requirements, including by inspection authority, and to deny, suspend, restrict, refuse to renew, or otherwise withhold a certification for failure to comply with those requirements. Under the bill, DCF may promulgate rules for the establishment, certification, operation, and monitoring of, and the placement of a child in, a QRTP.
Read the full summary Show less
Currently, when a child or juvenile (collectively referred to as “child” ) alleged or adjudged to be in need of protection or services is removed from his or her home in a proceeding under the Children's Code or Juvenile Justice Code, the agency responsible for that child's removal is required to prepare a permanency plan, designed to ensure that the child is reunified with his or her family whenever appropriate, or that the child quickly attains a placement or home providing long-term stability. Current law requires the juvenile court to periodically review the plan and to periodically hold a hearing on the plan.
Under this bill, if a child is placed in a certified QRTP, the agency must assemble a family permanency team to participate in permanency planning for the child, and invite appropriate biological family members, relatives, like-kin, and professionals who serve as a resource for the family to participate. The bill requires the agency to include in the permanency plan information about the family permanency team and its meetings and recommendations.
The bill requires that, in a review or hearing on a permanency plan for a child who is placed in a certified QRTP, the agency that prepared the permanency plan must present to the juvenile court certain information that the juvenile court must consider when determining the continuing necessity for and the safety and appropriateness of the placement, including 1) whether the placement is supported by assessment of the child's needs, is the most effective and appropriate level of care in the least restrictive environment, and meets the goals for the child in the permanency plan; 2) the specific treatment or service needs that the placement will meet and how long the child will need that treatment or service; and 3) the efforts made by the agency to prepare the child to return home or to be placed with a relative, guardian, or adoptive parent or in a foster home.
Under the bill, if a child is placed or proposed to be placed in a certified QRTP in juvenile court proceedings for a temporary physical custody (TPC) hearing, a change in placement (CIP), consent decree, or a disposition, a qualified individual must conduct an assessment, using a tool determined by DCF, of the strengths and needs of the child to determine the appropriateness of that placement (standardized assessment). The bill creates a definition for “qualified individual” to match the term used in federal law, meaning a trained professional or licensed clinician who is not an employee of the state and who is not connected to, or affiliated with, any placement setting in which children are placed by the state. The federal law definition provides that a state may request a waiver from this definition, and on December 14, 2020, Wisconsin requested such a waiver to allow state and county child welfare staff to serve as qualified individuals.
The bill requires the qualified individual to develop a recommendation on all of the following: 1) whether the proposed placement will provide the child with the most effective and appropriate level of care in the least restrictive environment; 2) how the placement is consistent with the short-term and long-term goals for the child in the permanency plan; 3) the reasons why the child's needs can or cannot be met by the child's family or in a foster home (and a shortage or lack of foster homes is not an acceptable reason); and 4) the placement preference of the family permanency team and, if it is not the placement recommended by the qualified individual, why that recommended placement is not preferred. Then, depending on the type of proceeding, the intake worker, agency primarily responsible for providing services under a temporary custody, person or agency primarily responsible for implementing the dispositional order, or agency appointed as the guardian of the child must submit the standardized assessment and the qualified individual's recommendation to the juvenile court and any person who is required to receive a copy of the notice or request in the proceeding.
Under the bill, the standardized assessment and recommendation must be submitted by the time of a TPC hearing, by the time the notice or request is filed in a CIP proceeding, by the time the consent decree is entered, or by the time the disposition report is filed. With respect to most CIP proceedings, if not available by the time the notice or request is filed, the bill generally requires it to be submitted within 10 days after the filing of the CIP notice, except this does not apply to a CIP requested by someone other than the intake worker, agency, district attorney, or corporation counsel or from in-home to out-of-home, to a consent decree, or to a disposition. In all cases, if the required information is not available by these first deadlines, it must be submitted no later than 30 days after the date on which the placement is made.
The bill requires the juvenile court to make the following findings when it issues an order placing a child in a certified QRTP: 1) whether the needs of the child can be met through placement in a foster home; 2) whether placement of the child in a certified QRTP provides the most effective and appropriate level of care for the child in the least restrictive environment; 3) whether the placement is consistent with the short-term and long-term goals for the child in the permanency plan; and 4) whether the juvenile court approves or disapproves the placement. The answers to these questions do not affect whether the placement may be made. If the standardized assessment and recommendation of the qualified individual are not available at the time of this order, the bill requires the juvenile court to defer making the findings. However, no later than 60 days after the date on which the placement was made the juvenile court must issue an order making those findings.
The bill requires that, for youth in out-of-home care who are parenting or pregnant, a permanency plan must include 1) a list of the services or programs to be provided to or on behalf of the child to ensure that the child, if pregnant, is prepared and, if a parent, is able to be a parent; and 2) the out-of-home care prevention strategy for any child born to the parenting or pregnant child.
Who's behind it
19 lawmakers are its . 11 are Democrats and 8 are Republicans.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 26 names Hide the names
Authors (19)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- Marisabel Cabrera · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Jodi Emerson · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Timothy Ramthun · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- Sara Rodriguez · Democrat, Assembly
- Katrina Shankland · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Shelia Stubbs · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- David Bowen · Democrat, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Children and Families vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 0 · May 6, 2021
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 21, 2021
The new law was published.
-
May 21, 2021
The governor signed it. It became 2021 Wisconsin Act 42.
-
May 20, 2021
Sent to the governor.
-
May 11, 2021
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
May 11, 2021
The Senate passed it too.
-
May 11, 2021
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
May 11, 2021
The Senate received it.
-
May 11, 2021
The Assembly passed it.
-
May 6, 2021
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
May 6, 2021
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.
-
Mar 29, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 24, 2021
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 24, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 5, 2021
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Children and Families.
-
Mar 5, 2021
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 5, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Rozar, Snyder, Armstrong, Billings, Cabrera, Considine, Dittrich, Edming, Emerson, Hebl, Ramthun, S. Rodriguez, Shankland, Sinicki, Spiros, Spreitzer, Stubbs, Subeck and Skowronski; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Johnson, Ballweg, Felzkowski and Larson
- Mar 5, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Children and Families
- Mar 24, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Bowen added as a coauthor
- Mar 24, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 29, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 31, 2021 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 6, 2021 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- May 6, 2021 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 6, 2021 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 by Committee on Rules
- May 11, 2021 · Assembly
Read a second time
- May 11, 2021 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- May 11, 2021 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- May 11, 2021 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- May 11, 2021 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Senate Organization and take up
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Read a second time
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Rules suspended
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
- May 11, 2021 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- May 11, 2021 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- May 18, 2021 · Assembly
LRB correction
- May 18, 2021 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 5-18-2021
- May 20, 2021 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-20-2021
- May 21, 2021 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-21-2021. 2021 Wisconsin Act 42
- May 21, 2021 · Assembly
Published 5-22-2021
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote