Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 147

Imposing requirements related to insurance data cybersecurity and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 5, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 15, 2022: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill imposes requirements relating to the protection of nonpublic information on insurers and other persons regulated by the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (licensees). The bill defines “nonpublic information” to mean nonpublic electronic information in the possession, custody, or control of a licensee that is either information concerning a Wisconsin resident that can be used to identify the individual in combination with another data element, such as a Social Security number, or certain health-related information that can be used to identify a Wisconsin resident.

Under the bill, a licensee must conduct a risk assessment and develop an information security program based on the assessment. The risk assessment must identify and assess reasonably foreseeable threats that could result in unauthorized access to or transmission, disclosure, misuse, alteration, or destruction of nonpublic information. The information security program must contain safeguards for the protection of the licensee's information systems and nonpublic information and be designed to mitigate threats, commensurate with the size and complexity of the licensee, the nature and scope of the licensee's activities, and the sensitivity of the nonpublic information. The bill requires the licensee to take specified risk mitigation actions and to monitor, evaluate, and adjust the information security program as appropriate.

Read the full summary

The bill also requires that a licensee develop an incident response plan to promptly respond to, and recover from, a cybersecurity event that compromises the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of nonpublic information, the licensee's information systems, or the continuing functionality of the licensee's business or operations. Under the bill, “cybersecurity event” generally means an event resulting in the unauthorized access to, or disruption or misuse of, an information system or nonpublic information stored on an information system.

The bill further requires that a licensee exercise due diligence in selecting third-party service providers and make reasonable efforts to require that a service provider implement measures to protect and secure information systems and nonpublic information and report the occurrence of any cybersecurity event.

Under the bill, the above requirements do not apply to a licensee who has less than $10 million in year-end total assets, less than $5 million in gross annual revenue, or fewer than 25 full-time employees. However, the commissioner may issue an order to require compliance by an otherwise exempt licensee if warranted by the licensee's circumstances. A licensee who is not exempt from the requirements must annually certify to the commissioner that the licensee has complied with them.

Additionally, if a licensee knows that a cybersecurity event has or may have occurred, the bill requires that the licensee conduct a prompt investigation to assess the nature and scope of the event and take related actions, including the performance of reasonable measures to restore the security of affected information systems. If the cybersecurity event involves an information system maintained by a third-party service provider, the licensee must comply with the investigation requirements or make reasonable efforts to confirm that the service provider has either complied with the requirements or failed to cooperate with the investigation.

Under the bill, a licensee must notify the commissioner of a cybersecurity event if either of the following conditions is met:

1. The licensee is domiciled in Wisconsin and the cybersecurity event has a reasonable likelihood of materially harming a Wisconsin resident or a material part of the licensee's normal operations.

2. The licensee reasonably believes that the cybersecurity event involves the nonpublic information of at least 250 Wisconsin residents, and the cybersecurity event either must be reported to a government entity under federal or state law or has a reasonable likelihood of materially harming a Wisconsin resident or a material part of the licensee's normal operations.

The notification must provide specified information about the cybersecurity event, including details about the event and its discovery, a description of the accessed nonpublic information, the number of affected Wisconsin residents, and the licensee's efforts to address the circumstances that allowed the event to occur. The licensee is required to update the commissioner on material changes to the information and as additional information becomes available. If the cybersecurity event involves a third-party service provider, the licensee must notify the commissioner of the event unless the service provider does so.

Under the bill, the commissioner has the power to examine and investigate the affairs of a licensee to determine whether a violation of any of the above requirements has occurred. A licensee must generally keep records relating to the requirements for at least five years and produce them upon demand of the commissioner. Any documents, materials, and other information from a licensee that are in the possession or control of the commissioner are confidential and privileged.

Who's behind it

18 representatives are its ⁠. 17 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (18)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Science vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 15, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Science vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 15, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Science vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 15, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Science vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jun 15, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 15, 2022

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 15, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Jun 15, 2021

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  4. May 27, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Mar 17, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 5, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband.

  7. Mar 5, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 5, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petersen, Ramthun, Brooks, Steffen, Dittrich, Tusler, Doyle, Spiros, Murphy, Petryk, Knodl, Rozar, Vorpagel, Armstrong, Kuglitsch, Tranel, Snyder and Moses; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Ringhand, Feyen and Marklein

  2. Mar 5, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband

  3. Mar 17, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petersen

  5. Apr 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petersen

  6. May 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petersen

  7. May 27, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Jun 1, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jun 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Jun 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  11. Jun 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  12. Jun 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology and Broadband, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  13. Jun 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Jun 16, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-22-2021 by Committee on Rules

  15. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  16. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote