Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 161

The disability rating at which veterans qualify for certain hunting and fishing authorizations and exemptions from state park and trail admission fees. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 23, 2022, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 16, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 96 to 0

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 15, 2022: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill establishes a 50 percent disability rating for disabled veterans to qualify for certain hunting, fishing, and trapping approvals issued by the Department of Natural Resources and for exemptions from certain admission fees.

Under current law, the qualifying disability rating is either 50 or 70 percent depending on the approval or exemption.

Read the full summary

Under current law generally, a person may not operate a vehicle in a state forest, state park, or state natural area unless the vehicle has a valid vehicle admission receipt properly displayed. Current law also authorizes DNR to charge a fee to enter a state trail. Current law provides that vehicle admission receipts and state trail passes are not required for a state resident who is a veteran receiving benefits for disabilities resulting in a 70 percent disability rating. The bill reduces the qualifying disability rating to 50 percent.

Under current law, DNR issues various hunting, fishing, and trapping licenses, permits, and tags, referred to collectively as approvals. DNR also issues certain combination licenses, including conservation patron licenses. A conservation patron license confers upon the licensee the combined privileges of certain hunting, fishing, and trapping approvals and the authority to take a motor vehicle into state parks and certain other areas without a vehicle admission receipt. The bill requires DNR to issue a conservation patron license at a reduced fee to a state resident who is a veteran receiving benefits for disabilities resulting in a 50 percent disability rating.

Under current law, no person may fish in the waters of the state without a valid fishing license or approval authorizing fishing. Current law provides that, upon application from a state resident who is a veteran receiving benefits for disabilities resulting in a 70 percent disability rating, DNR must issue the veteran an annual fishing license for disabled persons at a reduced fee. The bill reduces the qualifying disability rating to 50 percent.

Who's behind it

13 representatives are its ⁠. 10 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Sporting Heritage vote to recommend it

Passed, 14 to 0 · Feb 22, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 96 to 0 · Feb 23, 2022 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (96)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 15, 2022

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 24, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  3. Feb 23, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  4. Feb 23, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  5. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly passed it, 96 to 0.

  6. Feb 23, 2022

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 23, 2022

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Feb 22, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Feb 22, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 14 to 0.

  10. Jan 18, 2022

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  11. Jan 12, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. May 13, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Mar 16, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Sporting Heritage.

  14. Mar 16, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Armstrong, Baldeh, Brooks, Horlacher, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Moses, Ortiz-Velez, Rozar, Sinicki and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Jacque, Bradley, Bewley and L. Taylor

  2. Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage

  3. May 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Representatives Skowronski and Shelton added as coauthors

  6. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  8. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:04 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  10. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  12. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and taken up

  13. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 0

  16. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  19. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  20. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote