Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 243

Allocation of federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 funds for certain environmental purposes and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 22, 2021. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 2, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 56 to 36

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 13

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 22, 2021.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the governor to allocate funds accepted under the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) for certain environmental purposes.

Lead service line replacement Under current law, the Department of Administration and the Department of Natural Resources administer the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program (SDWLP), which provides low-interest loans and grants in the form of principal forgiveness to municipalities for drinking water infrastructure projects to help them comply with federal drinking water standards. DNR establishes a funding list for SDWLP projects, and DOA allocates funding for those projects. The current program does not provide financial assistance to private users of public water systems.

Read the full summary

The bill requires the governor to allocate $40,000,000 of the ARPA funds received by the state to provide, under SDWLP, principal forgiveness to municipalities to 1) cover up to 50 percent of the costs of lead service line replacement on private property or 2) provide grants to private users of public water systems to cover up to 50 percent of the costs of lead service line replacement on private property.

Urban nonpoint source program Under current law, DNR administers a program to provide financial assistance for projects that manage urban storm water and runoff. The bill requires the governor to allocate $12,000,000 of the ARPA funds received by the state to this program.

Rural nonpoint source program Under current law, DNR administers a program to provide financial assistance for projects that control pollution that comes from diffuse sources, rather than from a single concentrated discharge of pollution, in areas that qualify as high priority due to water quality problems. The bill requires the governor to allocate $6,500,000 of the ARPA funds received by the state to this program.

Well compensation grant program Under the well compensation grant program under current law, certain individual owners or renters of certain contaminated private wells may apply for a grant from DNR to cover a portion of the costs to treat the water, reconstruct the well, construct a new well, connect to a public water supply, or fill and seal the well. The bill requires the governor to allocate $2,000,000 of the ARPA funds received by the state to this program.

Grants for well testing and public education The bill requires DNR to create and administer a program to provide grants to counties to either 1) test and map privately owned wells to assess groundwater quality and to determine the extent and type of any contamination and study and map geologic characteristics and well construction practices in the county to determine any correlation between water quality, geology, and well construction; or 2) if a county has completed this type of study, to notify the public of the results of the study and to notify private well owners whose wells may be contaminated based on the results of the completed study. Under the bill, DNR may not provide more than $10,000 to any single county for testing and study under the first type of grant, or more than $2,500 per county for notifications under the second type of grant.

Counties may apply for a grant individually or as a group. The bill requires a county that receives a grant under this program to provide an equal amount of matching funds. The county must also share the results of its testing with the Center for Watershed Science and Education, but may not include any personally identifiable information with the submitted results.

The bill requires the governor to allocate $500,000 of the ARPA funds received by the state for these purposes.

Who's behind it

21 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 21 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (21)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 4 · Apr 7, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 56 to 36 · Apr 13, 2021 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (56)

Official motion: “SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 56 to 36 · Apr 13, 2021 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (56)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Apr 14, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 13 · Apr 14, 2021 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 26, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 22, 2021

    The governor vetoed it.

  4. Apr 21, 2021

    Sent to the governor.

  5. Apr 14, 2021

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 13.

  6. Apr 14, 2021

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Apr 14, 2021

    The Senate received it.

  8. Apr 13, 2021

    The Assembly passed it, 56 to 36.

  9. Apr 13, 2021

    “Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken” (the official wording)

  10. Apr 9, 2021

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Apr 7, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Apr 7, 2021

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 4.

  13. Apr 6, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Apr 6, 2021

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Apr 2, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.

  16. Apr 2, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Thiesfeldt, Krug, Armstrong, Cabral-Guevara, Duchow, Edming, James, Knodl, Kurtz, Loudenbeck, Moses, Mursau, Oldenburg, Petryk, Rozar, Snyder, Swearingen, Tranel, Wittke and Zimmerman; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Marklein, Felzkowski, Ballweg and Feyen

  2. Apr 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. Apr 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor

  4. Apr 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 4

  7. Apr 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 8, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2021 by Committee on Rules

  9. Apr 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  10. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Anderson, Baldeh, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Cabrera, Conley, Considine, Doyle, Drake, Emerson, Goyke, Haywood, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hong, McGuire, B. Meyers, Milroy, Moore Omokunde, L. Myers, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Pope, Riemer, S. Rodriguez, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Spreitzer, Stubbs, Subeck, Vining and Vruwink

  12. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  13. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  14. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 56, Noes 36

  15. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 36

  18. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-14-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 13

  26. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Apr 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  28. Apr 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-14-2021

  29. Apr 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-21-2021 by directive of the Speaker

  30. Apr 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-22-2021

  31. Apr 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  32. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  33. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote