Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 295

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: licensing and regulation of pharmacies and remote dispensing sites under the pharmacy practice law, the practice of pharmacy, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Alcohol and other drug abuse Hospitals and health care facilities Pharmacy

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Generally, under current law, no pharmacist may dispense at any location in

this state that is not licensed as a pharmacy by the Pharmacy Examining Board,

except that a pharmacist may, pursuant to rules promulgated by the board, dispense

at certain specifically identified types of locations that are not licensed as

pharmacies, which include health care facilities, health care provider offices or

clinics, and jails and other adult and juvenile correctional or residential facilities.

This bill provides instead that a pharmacist may dispense at one of those

locations only if the location is licensed by the board as a pharmacy. The bill requires

this kind of pharmacy to adhere to a number of requirements that apply to other

pharmacies, including the requirement for a managing pharmacist to be designated

for the pharmacy. However, the bill allows this kind of pharmacy to be operated as

a remote dispensing site, in which case a pharmacist is not required to be present at

the pharmacy but must supervise it remotely. The bill also allows the board to

promulgate rules governing pharmacies operated as remote dispensing sites, which

may exempt pharmacies operated as remote dispensing sites from rules that apply

to other pharmacies.

This bill exempts a person who is providing services as directed, supervised,

and inspected by certain medical professionals from the requirement to be licensed

as a pharmacist by the board while the person is providing the services at a narcotic

treatment service for opiate addiction or a free and charitable clinic, as defined in the

bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Brandtjen (R) , Gundrum (R) , Horlacher (R) , Milroy (D) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Skowronski (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tittl (R)

5 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Carpenter (D) , Felzkowski (R) , Feyen (R) , Subeck (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 13, Noes 0

Passed 13–0 Oct 21, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 3, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Brandtjen, Gundrum, Horlacher, Milroy, Mursau, Novak, Tittl, Skowronski and Thiesfeldt; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Ballweg, Carpenter and Felzkowski

  2. May 3, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. May 12, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 29, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 19, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  7. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-26-2021 by Committee on Rules

  9. Oct 25, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  10. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1