Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 313

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: legal custody and physical placement factors for a child of a service member.

Court — Procedure Family — Support Military personnel National guard

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, in determining the legal custody of a child, a court may not

consider whether a service member has been or may be called into active duty and

consequently is or may be absent from his or her home. Under current law, “service

member” is defined as a member of the national guard or a reserve unit of the U.S.

armed forces. Under this bill, “service member,” for the purposes of determining

legal custody and physical placement of a child adds a member of the U.S. armed

forces or forces incorporated in the U.S. armed forces to the definition.

This bill also prohibits a court from denying a parent who is a service member

periods of physical placement with his or her child based on past or future

anticipated variability in his or her schedule, living arrangements, or location due

to service in the military.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , Brandtjen (R) , James (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Rozar (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tusler (R) , Wichgers (R)

2 cosponsors

Edming (R) , Jacque (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 1, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Wichgers, Armstrong, Brandtjen, James, Knodl, Krug, Rozar and Tusler; cosponsored by Senator Jacque

  2. May 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Dec 1, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 6, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Edming added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1