Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: the procedure for promulgating a proposed rule relating to fish or wildlife that is considered at the joint annual spring hearing of the Department of Natural Resources and the Wisconsin Conservation Congress. (FE)
Administrative rules Conservation congress Governor Legislature Natural resources board Natural resources department of — Environmental protection
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to the rule-making process with respect to
proposed administrative rules relating to fish or wildlife that are considered at the
joint annual spring hearing of the Department of Natural Resources and the
Wisconsin Conservation Congress (spring DNR-WCC meeting).
Gubernatorial approval and statements of scope for proposed rules
Current law requires a statement of the scope of a proposed rule to be presented
to the Department of Administration and be approved by the governor and the
individual or body that has policy-making powers for a state agency before a state
employee or official may perform any activity in connection with the drafting of the
proposed rule. Under the bill, for rules that are considered at the spring DNR-WCC
meeting, only the Natural Resources Board is required to approve a statement of
scope before those activities may be performed. In addition, the bill permits
automatic approval of a statement of scope for rules that are considered at the spring
DNR-WCC meeting if the Natural Resources Board does not disapprove the
statement of scope within 30 days after it is presented to the board or by the 11th day
after its publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register, whichever is later.
Under current law, a state agency must prepare and obtain approval of a
revised statement of scope if, after a statement of scope is approved, the agency
changes the scope of the proposed rule in any meaningful or measurable way. Under
the bill, this requirement does not apply to rules that are considered at the spring
DNR-WCC meeting.
Under current law, a state agency must prepare and obtain approval of a
statement of scope for a proposed emergency rule in the same manner as a statement
of scope is prepared and approved for a nonemergency rule. Under the bill, a
statement of scope is not required for emergency rules considered at the spring
DNR-WCC meeting.
Finally, current law requires a state agency to submit a proposed rule in final
draft form to the governor for approval before the rule may be submitted to the
legislature for review and to submit a proposed emergency rule in final draft form
to the governor for approval before the emergency rule may be filed with the
Legislative Reference Bureau for publication. The bill eliminates these
requirements for gubernatorial approval for rules that are considered at the spring
DNR-WCC meeting.
Economic impact analyses for proposed rules
When report must be prepared.
Current law requires each state agency to
prepare an economic impact analysis for all permanent rules proposed by the agency.
In addition, current law requires a state agency to prepare a revised economic impact
analysis if a proposed rule is modified after the original economic impact analysis is
submitted so as to significantly change the economic impact of the proposed rule.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- May 13, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spreitzer, Anderson, Baldeh, Billings, Cabrera, Considine, Doyle, Hebl, Pope, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Subeck and Vruwink; cosponsored by Senators Smith, Carpenter, Ringhand and Agard
- May 13, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage
- May 21, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1