Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 399

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: interest on claims of excessive assessment and for recovery of unlawful property taxes. (FE)

Interest Municipality — Taxation National guard Property tax — Assessment Revenue department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a person may file a claim with the taxation district where

the property is located to recover unlawful property taxes. A person who files a claim

must allege at least one of the following as the basis for the claim:

1. The taxation district made a clerical error regarding the description of the

property or the computation of the tax.

2. The assessment included real property improvements that did not exist on

the date of the assessment.

3. The property is exempt from taxation.

4. The property is not located in the taxation district.

5. The taxation district made a double assessment of the property.

If the taxation district allows the claim, it pays the claimant the amount of

property taxes collected and may include interest at the rate of 0.8 percent a month,

computed from the date on which the person filed the claim.

Under current law, a person may also file a claim with the taxation district

where the property is located alleging that the assessment of the person's property

is excessive. If the taxation district allows the claim, it pays the claimant the amount

of the excess and may include interest at the average annual discount rate

determined by the last auction of six-month U.S. treasury bills before the filing of

the claim per day for the period between the time when the tax was due and the date

that the claim was paid. This rate is generally lower than the rate of interest paid

on claims to recover unlawful property taxes.

This bill changes the interest rate for payments made on a claim to recover

unlawful taxes so that it is the same as the payments made on a claim of excessive

assessment.

Under current law, when a taxation district rescinds or refunds property taxes

paid by a taxpayer in the district, the district may submit a form to the Department

of Revenue to collect from each underlying taxing jurisdiction its proportionate share

of the rescinded or refunded amount. However, that amount does not include

interest paid by the taxation district on claims for excessive assessment or to recover

unlawful property taxes. This bill allows the taxation district to collect from each

underlying taxing jurisdiction its proportionate share of the interest paid on claims

for excessive assessment or to recover unlawful property taxes.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , Armstrong (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Brooks (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Edming (R) , Gundrum (R) , James (R) , Knodl (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Novak (R) , Schraa (R) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R)

7 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Cowles (R) , Dittrich (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Petrowski (R) , Ringhand (D) , Steffen (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Oct 21, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Oct 21, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 14, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 14, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Allen, Armstrong, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Edming, Gundrum, James, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Novak, Schraa, Spiros, Subeck, Tittl, VanderMeer and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Ballweg, Cowles, Ringhand and L. Taylor

  2. Jun 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

  3. Jun 17, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Dittrich added as a coauthor

  4. Jun 24, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Brooks

  5. Jul 1, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Aug 4, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  7. Aug 25, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Sep 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-26-2021 by Committee on Rules

  11. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  13. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Oct 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Oct 27, 2021 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Nov 2, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue

  21. Jan 11, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Jan 12, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski

  23. Jan 13, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Jan 14, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  25. Jan 14, 2022 · Senate

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  26. Jan 14, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1