Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: responses to reports relating to elder adults at risk and adults at risk.
Criminal identification and investigation Health services department of — Supportive living and treatment Intellectual disabilities Mental health Senior citizen
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law requires employees of entities that are credentialed by the
Department of Health Services to report to the county department, the
elder-adult-at-risk agency, DHS, the Board on Aging and Long-term Care, or law
enforcement a request by an elder adult at risk to make a report; a reasonable belief
that an elder adult at risk is at imminent risk of serious bodily harm, death, sexual
assault, or significant property loss but is unable to make an informed judgment
whether to make a report; or a reasonable belief that any elder adult at risk is at risk
of any of those harms by a suspected perpetrator. An “elder adult at risk” is defined
under current law as a person age 60 or older who has experienced, is experiencing,
or is at risk of experiencing abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect.
Upon receiving a report, the elder-adult-at-risk agency must respond to the report
or refer the report to another agency for investigation or, if the alleged victim is a
client of a credentialed entity and if the suspected perpetrator of the harm is a
caregiver or nonclient resident of the entity, must refer the report to DHS. Current
law specifies that the agency's response or investigation may include any of the
following actions: a visit to the elder adult at risk's residence; observation of or
interview with the elder adult at risk; interview with a guardian, agent under an
activated power of attorney for health care, or caregiver of the elder adult at risk; or
review of treatment and patient health care records or financial records. This bill
requires that at least one of these specified actions be included in the response or
investigation.
Current law contains a similar reporting requirement for similar types of
harms to adults at risk, who are adults who have a physical or mental condition that
substantially impairs their ability to care for their needs and who have experienced,
are experiencing, or are at risk of experiencing abuse, financial exploitation, neglect,
or self-neglect. Current law requires the recipient of a report, if the alleged victim
is a client of a credentialed entity and if the suspected perpetrator is a caregiver or
nonresident client of the entity, to refer the report to DHS, but under other
circumstances, the adult-at-risk agency is allowed but not required to respond to a
reasonable belief that an adult at risk is the subject of abuse, financial exploitation,
neglect, or self-neglect. The bill requires an adult-at-risk agency that receives a
report of alleged abuse or an adult-at-risk agency that has reason to believe an
adult-at-risk is the subject of the harms specified under current law to respond by
conducting an investigation or by referring the report to another agency for
investigation. The bill also requires the investigating agency to include at least one
of the actions specified in current law, which are the same actions described for
investigations related to elder adults at risk.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 14, Noes 0
Passed 14–0 Nov 15, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 14, Noes 0
Passed 14–0 Nov 15, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 14, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Rozar, Armstrong, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Edming, Gundrum, Murphy, Sinicki, Skowronski, Spiros, Subeck and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Jacque, Ballweg and L. Taylor
- Jun 14, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety
- Sep 8, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 9, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Stubbs added as a coauthor
- Sep 15, 2021 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Rozar
- Sep 22, 2021 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 15, 2021 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Nov 15, 2021 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Nov 15, 2021 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-20-2022 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Cabrera added as a coauthor
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1