Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: ratification of the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Interstate compact Occupational therapy
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill ratifies and enters Wisconsin into the Occupational Therapy Licensure
Compact (compact), which provides for the ability of an occupational therapist or
occupational therapy assistant licensed in one member state (licensee) to obtain a
“compact privilege” to practice in a remote state without obtaining a license in that
remote state. Significant provisions of the compact include:
1. The creation of a Occupational Therapy Compact Commission (commission),
which includes one member or representative of the licensure boards of each member
state. The compact grants various powers and duties to the commission, including
overseeing the administration of the compact, enforcing the compact, adopting
bylaws, promulgating binding rules for the compact, establishing an executive
committee, and employing officers and employees. The commission may levy on and
collect an annual assessment from each member state or impose fees on other parties
to cover the cost of the operations and activities of the commission and its staff.
2. A process whereby a licensee may obtain a compact privilege to practice in
another member state. A licensee's primary state of residence is considered to be his
or her home state, and any other member state in which the licensee seeks to practice
is considered a remote state. A licensee providing occupational therapy in a remote
state under a compact privilege is subject to that state's regulatory authority. A
remote state may take action against a licensee's compact privilege in the remote
state, and the licensee is then not eligible for a compact privilege in any state until
certain criteria are met. If a licensee's compact privilege in any remote state is
removed, the individual may lose his or her compact privilege in any remote state
until certain criteria are met. However, a home state has the exclusive power to
impose adverse action against a license issued by the home state. If a home state
license is encumbered (i.e., suspended), the licensee's compact privilege in any
remote state is deactivated until all encumbrances have been removed from the
home state license. Member states may charge a fee for granting a compact privilege
and may impose a jurisprudence requirement for granting a compact privilege that
assesses an individual's knowledge of the laws and rules governing the practice of
occupational therapy in a particular state.
3. The ability for member boards to conduct joint investigations of licensees and
the ability of member states to issue subpoenas that are enforceable in other states.
4. The creation of a coordinated database and reporting system containing
licensure, adverse action, and investigative information on all licensed individuals
in member states. A member state must submit a uniform data set to the data system
on all individuals to whom this compact is applicable as required by the rules of the
commission.
5. Various provisions regarding resolutions of disputes between the
commission and member states and between member and nonmember states,
including a process for termination of a state's membership in the compact if the state
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Billings (D) , Brandtjen (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Dallman (R) , Doyle (D) , Knodl (R) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Pronschinske (R) , Rozar (R) , Shelton (D) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wichgers (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Jan 18, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 25, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives VanderMeer, Moses, Cabral-Guevara, Billings, Brandtjen, Dallman, Doyle, Knodl, Mursau, Novak, Oldenburg, Pronschinske, Rozar, Spiros, Subeck, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Wichgers, Shelton and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Ballweg, Cowles, Felzkowski, Marklein, Nass, L. Taylor and Pfaff
- Jun 25, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform
- Jul 1, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Andraca added as a coauthor
- Jul 8, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 26, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor
- Jul 28, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 4, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Cabrera added as a coauthor
- Aug 24, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor
- Sep 20, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 19, 2021 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-20-2022 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1