Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 410

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: ratification of the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Interstate compact Occupational therapy

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill ratifies and enters Wisconsin into the Occupational Therapy Licensure

Compact (compact), which provides for the ability of an occupational therapist or

occupational therapy assistant licensed in one member state (licensee) to obtain a

“compact privilege” to practice in a remote state without obtaining a license in that

remote state. Significant provisions of the compact include:

1. The creation of a Occupational Therapy Compact Commission (commission),

which includes one member or representative of the licensure boards of each member

state. The compact grants various powers and duties to the commission, including

overseeing the administration of the compact, enforcing the compact, adopting

bylaws, promulgating binding rules for the compact, establishing an executive

committee, and employing officers and employees. The commission may levy on and

collect an annual assessment from each member state or impose fees on other parties

to cover the cost of the operations and activities of the commission and its staff.

2. A process whereby a licensee may obtain a compact privilege to practice in

another member state. A licensee's primary state of residence is considered to be his

or her home state, and any other member state in which the licensee seeks to practice

is considered a remote state. A licensee providing occupational therapy in a remote

state under a compact privilege is subject to that state's regulatory authority. A

remote state may take action against a licensee's compact privilege in the remote

state, and the licensee is then not eligible for a compact privilege in any state until

certain criteria are met. If a licensee's compact privilege in any remote state is

removed, the individual may lose his or her compact privilege in any remote state

until certain criteria are met. However, a home state has the exclusive power to

impose adverse action against a license issued by the home state. If a home state

license is encumbered (i.e., suspended), the licensee's compact privilege in any

remote state is deactivated until all encumbrances have been removed from the

home state license. Member states may charge a fee for granting a compact privilege

and may impose a jurisprudence requirement for granting a compact privilege that

assesses an individual's knowledge of the laws and rules governing the practice of

occupational therapy in a particular state.

3. The ability for member boards to conduct joint investigations of licensees and

the ability of member states to issue subpoenas that are enforceable in other states.

4. The creation of a coordinated database and reporting system containing

licensure, adverse action, and investigative information on all licensed individuals

in member states. A member state must submit a uniform data set to the data system

on all individuals to whom this compact is applicable as required by the rules of the

commission.

5. Various provisions regarding resolutions of disputes between the

commission and member states and between member and nonmember states,

including a process for termination of a state's membership in the compact if the state

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Billings (D) , Brandtjen (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Dallman (R) , Doyle (D) , Knodl (R) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Pronschinske (R) , Rozar (R) , Shelton (D) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wichgers (R)

11 cosponsors

Andraca (D) , Ballweg (R) , Cabrera (D) , Cowles (R) , Felzkowski (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Pfaff (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Jan 18, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 25, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives VanderMeer, Moses, Cabral-Guevara, Billings, Brandtjen, Dallman, Doyle, Knodl, Mursau, Novak, Oldenburg, Pronschinske, Rozar, Spiros, Subeck, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Wichgers, Shelton and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Ballweg, Cowles, Felzkowski, Marklein, Nass, L. Taylor and Pfaff

  2. Jun 25, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform

  3. Jul 1, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Andraca added as a coauthor

  4. Jul 8, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor

  6. Jul 28, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Aug 4, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Cabrera added as a coauthor

  8. Aug 24, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  9. Sep 20, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Oct 19, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-20-2022 by Committee on Rules

  14. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  15. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1