Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: regulating and addressing PFAS, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Air pollution Environmental protection Fire department Food Football Municipality — Finance Soil and soil conservation Water — Pollution Water supply Wells
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to existing programs, creates new programs
and standards, provides funding, and creates new positions to address
perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Groundwater standards for PFAS
Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources maintains a list of
substances that have a reasonable probability of entering the groundwater resources
of the state and that are shown to involve public health concerns. The Department
of Health Services recommends groundwater enforcement standards for substances
on this list, which DNR then proposes as DNR rules in its rule-making process.
The bill requires DNR to apply DHS's recommended groundwater enforcement
standard for any PFAS as an interim groundwater enforcement standard for all
facilities, practices, and activities that may affect groundwater and that are
regulated by certain state agencies, unless emergency or permanent rules that
establish an enforcement standard for those substances are in effect.
Drinking water standards for PFAS
The bill also requires DNR to apply DHS's recommended enforcement standard
for any PFAS as an interim maximum contaminant level for public water systems
and water suppliers. DNR must also require public water systems and water
suppliers to monitor for such PFAS in accordance with requirements under current
DNR rules. The bill also requires public water systems and water suppliers to use
certain specified treatment technologies as an interim best available technology to
treat PFAS for which DHS has recommended an enforcement standard. Public water
systems and water suppliers must also use laboratories certified to analyze drinking
water to conduct required testing, and must use the method detection limit for
reporting purposes.
Water quality criteria for PFAS
Under the federal Clean Water Act and under current state law, DNR is
required to set water quality standards for the waters of the state. Water quality
standards consist of designated uses for each of the waters of the state, water quality
criteria for those waters based on their designated use, and antidegradation
provisions that prohibit the degradation of existing uses. This bill requires DNR to
promulgate water quality criteria for any PFAS for which DHS has recommended a
groundwater enforcement standard.
Soil and sediment residual contamination levels for PFAS
Under current law, when a responsible party conducts a cleanup action to
address soil contamination, the cleanup must be designed and implemented to
restore the contaminated soil to certain designated residual contaminant levels or
performance standards. Under this bill, DNR must require responsible parties to
establish residual contaminant levels for the cleanup of contaminated soil and
sediment as a result of a discharge of any PFAS for which DHS has recommended
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Andraca (D) , B. Meyers (D) , Baldeh (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , Cabrera (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Doyle (D) , Drake (D) , Emerson (D) , Haywood (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Hong (D) , L. Myers (D) , Milroy (D) , Moore Omokunde (D) , Neubauer (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , S. Rodriguez (D) , Shankland (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snodgrass (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Vining (D) , Vruwink (D)
Full history
- Jun 25, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Baldeh, Hebl, Shankland, Shelton, Billings, Sinicki, Neubauer, Hong, Hintz, Snodgrass, Andraca, Conley, Considine, Subeck, Brostoff, Pope, S. Rodriguez, Cabrera, Anderson, Emerson, Doyle, Hesselbein, Drake, Vining, Vruwink, Bowen, Stubbs, Ohnstad, Spreitzer, B. Meyers, Ortiz-Velez, Riemer, Milroy, Moore Omokunde, L. Myers and Haywood; cosponsored by Senators Agard, Pfaff, Smith, Roys, Larson, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Wirch, L. Taylor, Johnson, Ringhand and Bewley
- Jun 25, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Accountability and Oversight
- Aug 9, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 11, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 11, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 8, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Goyke added as a coauthor
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1