Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 47

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: qualification of newspapers to receive compensation for publication of legal notices and requirements relating to publication.

Newspaper and magazine Public document

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill changes the criteria for a newspaper to be eligible for compensation for

publication of legal notices. Under current law, with certain exceptions, in order for

a newspaper to qualify for compensation for publication of a legal notice, the

newspaper must have bona fide paid circulation, meaning the paid circulation of a

newspaper for which 1) the publisher of the newspaper sells 50 percent or more of

the circulation of the newspaper; and 2) the publisher of the newspaper has actual

subscribers at each publication of not less than 1,000 copies in first and second class

cities (cities of 150,000 people or more and cities with between 39,000 and 150,000

people, respectively); 300 copies in third and fourth class cities (cities with between

10,000 and 39,000 people and cities with less than 10,000 people, respectively);

villages; or towns. The bill eliminates the requirement that the publisher of the

newspaper sells 50 percent or more of the circulation of the newspaper.

Under current law, in addition to bona fide circulation, a newspaper must

generally meet one of the following criteria to qualify for compensation: 1) for at least

two of the five years immediately before the date of publication of a notice, have been

published regularly and continuously in the city, village, or town where published;

2) be a successor to such a newspaper and resumed publication following succession;

or 3) have merged or consolidated with one or more other newspapers and one of the

newspapers involved has been continuously published at regular intervals of at least

once each week for at at least 50 issues each year for at least one year prior to the

first publication of the notice. The bill modifies the first qualification, eliminating

the requirement that a newspaper be published regularly and continuously in the

city, village, or town where published for at least two of the five years immediately

before the date of publication of a notice, and instead allowing a newspaper to qualify

that has been published at least once a week for at least 50 consecutive issues prior

to the first publication of the notice in the city, village, or town where published.

Under current law, if there is not a newspaper in a city, village, or town that

meets any of the general criteria, a newspaper may still qualify for compensation

under an alternative provision if the newspaper is published regularly and

continuously in the city, village, or town, publishing in the newspaper is likely to give

notice in the area or to the affected person, and the newspaper is otherwise qualified

for compensation. The bill changes the alternative criteria, modifying the “regularly

and continuously” requirement to a requirement that the newspaper be circulated

at least once each week for at least 50 issues each year for one year prior to the first

publication of the notice in the city, village or town and requiring that the newspaper

contain, on average, at least 10 percent news content per issue. The bill also provides

an exception to the definition of “newspaper” to allow newspapers to qualify under

these alternative criteria.

The bill adds a requirement that a newspaper that publishes a legal notice must

place an electronic copy of the legal notice at no additional charge on that

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , Billings (D) , Doyle (D) , Duchow (R) , James (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Milroy (D) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Rozar (R) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Steffen (R) , Subeck (D) , Vruwink (D)

5 cosponsors

Bewley (D) , Cowles (R) , Edming (R) , Pfaff (D) , Testin (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 6, Noes 0

Passed 6–0 May 6, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 May 6, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Armstrong, Billings, Doyle, Duchow, James, Knodl, Loudenbeck, Milroy, Moses, Mursau, Novak, Rozar, Skowronski, Steffen, Subeck, Vruwink and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Bewley, Pfaff and Testin

  2. Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government

  3. Mar 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kitchens

  5. Apr 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. May 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  7. May 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  8. May 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. May 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 by Committee on Rules

  10. May 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Edming added as a coauthor

  11. May 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1