Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 470

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: eliminating criminal defenses of adequate provocation, self-defense, or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect if the claim is based on the victim's gender identity or sexual orientation.

Crime and criminals Crime victim Discrimination Lesbian gay bisexual and transgender Mental health

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law provides specific defenses to criminal liability. For instance, a

charge of first-degree intentional homicide may be mitigated to second-degree

intentional homicide if, at the time of committing the crime, the defendant

reasonably believes the victim has done something that adequately provokes the

defendant to lack self-control completely. Another defense is the privilege of

self-defense under which a person may threaten or intentionally use force against

another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably

believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by the other person.

Under this bill, a defendant may not assert adequate provocation or self-defense as

a defense if the criminal action in question resulted from the discovery of, knowledge

about, or potential disclosure of the victim's gender identity or expression or sexual

orientation, including under circumstances in which the victim made a romantic or

sexual advance without use or threat of force or violence toward the defendant.

Under current law, a person is not responsible for criminal conduct if, when the

person committed the conduct, he or she was suffering from a mental disease or

defect so that he or she lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the

wrongfulness of the conduct or to conform his or her conduct to the requirements of

law. To raise this defense, a defendant must plead not guilty by reason of mental

disease or defect. Then, at the trial, if the defendant is found guilty of the crime, the

court must then determine if the person is not responsible for the crime due to mental

disease or defect. If the person is found not responsible due to mental disease or

defect, the person is committed to the Department of Heath Services for treatment

for a period that varies depending on the severity of the crime. Under this bill,

mental disease or defect does not include a state that is brought on by or results from

the discovery of, knowledge about, or potential disclosure of another's gender

identity or expression or sexual orientation, including under circumstances in which

the other person made a romantic or sexual advance without use or threat of force

or violence toward the defendant.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Andraca (D) , Baldeh (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , Cabrera (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Emerson (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hong (D) , McGuire (D) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , S. Rodriguez (D) , Shankland (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snodgrass (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Vining (D)

6 cosponsors

Agard (D) , Carpenter (D) , Johnson (D) , Larson (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D)

Full history

  1. Jul 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Neubauer, Cabrera, Novak, Snodgrass, Spreitzer, Anderson, Andraca, Baldeh, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Conley, Considine, Emerson, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hong, McGuire, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, S. Rodriguez, Shankland, Sinicki, Shelton, Stubbs, Subeck and Vining; cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Agard, Johnson, Larson, Roys and Smith

  2. Jul 26, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1