Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: eliminating criminal defenses of adequate provocation, self-defense, or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect if the claim is based on the victim's gender identity or sexual orientation.
Crime and criminals Crime victim Discrimination Lesbian gay bisexual and transgender Mental health
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law provides specific defenses to criminal liability. For instance, a
charge of first-degree intentional homicide may be mitigated to second-degree
intentional homicide if, at the time of committing the crime, the defendant
reasonably believes the victim has done something that adequately provokes the
defendant to lack self-control completely. Another defense is the privilege of
self-defense under which a person may threaten or intentionally use force against
another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably
believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by the other person.
Under this bill, a defendant may not assert adequate provocation or self-defense as
a defense if the criminal action in question resulted from the discovery of, knowledge
about, or potential disclosure of the victim's gender identity or expression or sexual
orientation, including under circumstances in which the victim made a romantic or
sexual advance without use or threat of force or violence toward the defendant.
Under current law, a person is not responsible for criminal conduct if, when the
person committed the conduct, he or she was suffering from a mental disease or
defect so that he or she lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the
wrongfulness of the conduct or to conform his or her conduct to the requirements of
law. To raise this defense, a defendant must plead not guilty by reason of mental
disease or defect. Then, at the trial, if the defendant is found guilty of the crime, the
court must then determine if the person is not responsible for the crime due to mental
disease or defect. If the person is found not responsible due to mental disease or
defect, the person is committed to the Department of Heath Services for treatment
for a period that varies depending on the severity of the crime. Under this bill,
mental disease or defect does not include a state that is brought on by or results from
the discovery of, knowledge about, or potential disclosure of another's gender
identity or expression or sexual orientation, including under circumstances in which
the other person made a romantic or sexual advance without use or threat of force
or violence toward the defendant.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Andraca (D) , Baldeh (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , Cabrera (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Emerson (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hong (D) , McGuire (D) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , S. Rodriguez (D) , Shankland (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snodgrass (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Vining (D)
Full history
- Jul 26, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Neubauer, Cabrera, Novak, Snodgrass, Spreitzer, Anderson, Andraca, Baldeh, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Conley, Considine, Emerson, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hong, McGuire, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, S. Rodriguez, Shankland, Sinicki, Shelton, Stubbs, Subeck and Vining; cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Agard, Johnson, Larson, Roys and Smith
- Jul 26, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1