Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 49

The wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 23, 2022, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 10, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2022

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 15, 2022: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes to the wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program.

Current law authorizes a person who owns, leases, or controls land on which certain wild animals cause damage to crops or livestock (wildlife damage) to apply to the county for wildlife damage claim payments and for wildlife damage abatement assistance (wildlife damage payments). Wildlife damage for which a person is eligible to receive wildlife damage payments includes damage caused by deer, bears, geese, and cougars, as well as elk and sandhill cranes if hunting those animals is authorized. Current law requires that, to be eligible for wildlife damage payments, the location must be in a county that participates in the administration of these programs. A county must apply to the Department of Natural Resources to administer these programs, including in its application a plan of administration that meets certain requirements. Once approved, DNR provides funding to the county for the costs incurred in administering these programs.

Read the full summary

Under current law and DNR rule, a county pays 75 percent of the actual costs of providing wildlife damage abatement assistance, for which it is reimbursed by DNR, and the person receiving the assistance pays 25 percent of the costs. DNR pays wildlife damage claims directly.

Effective January 1, 2022, this bill removes counties from the administration of these programs and requires DNR to administer the programs instead. The bill specifies that, if DNR provides wildlife damage abatement assistance to a person, it must determine the actual cost of providing that assistance and pay 75 percent of that cost, leaving the remaining 25 percent as the responsibility of the recipient. The bill eliminates a $10,000 limit under current law on the total amount that may be paid to a claimant for each damage claim. The bill maintains the current law requirement that DNR pay claimants on a prorated basis if there is not a sufficient amount appropriated to pay all claims.

The bill also eliminates the requirement under current law that a county participate in the administration of these programs in order to be eligible for reimbursement by DNR for the costs that the county incurs in processing and donating venison from certain deer carcasses and in processing and donating meat from certain wild turkey carcasses.

Under current law, the type of wildlife damage that is eligible for wildlife damage claim payments is limited to damage to commercial seedings or crops growing on agricultural land, damage to crops that have been harvested for sale or further use but that have not been removed from the agricultural land, damage to orchard trees or nursery stock, and damage to apiaries or livestock. This bill adds that damage to commercial seedings or crops growing on agricultural land caused by operating a vehicle in a field in order to place a bear trap under the wildlife damage abatement program is eligible for a wildlife damage claim payment.

Under current law, if the amount of a wildlife damage claim exceeds $500 but does not exceed $5,250, the claimant is paid 100 percent of the amount, and if the amount of the claim exceeds $5,250, the claimant is paid that amount plus 80 percent of the amount that exceeds $5,250. This bill increases the wildlife damage claim amount threshold from $5,250 to $5,500.

Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person may receive wildlife damage payments only if the person opens the land for hunting the type of animal that caused the wildlife damage. Under this bill, this hunting requirement does not apply to a person who receives wildlife damage abatement assistance to acquire a bear trap for land the person leases if the person waives any eligibility to receive a wildlife damage claim payment for damage caused by bears.

Under the bill, effective June 30, 2021, DNR must require all bear traps acquired with wildlife damage abatement assistance to be equipped with remote monitors, including traps placed under the program prior to the effective date of the bill.

Who's behind it

13 representatives are its ⁠. 12 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 17, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 1 · Feb 17, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 15, 2022

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 24, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Sporting Heritage, Small Business and Rural Issues.

  3. Feb 23, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  4. Feb 23, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  5. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly passed it.

  6. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Feb 17, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 17, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 1.

  9. Jan 5, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Jan 4, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Mar 2, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 10, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  13. Feb 10, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Edming, Armstrong, Callahan, Krug, Milroy, Moses, Mursau, Plumer, Rozar, Skowronski, Spiros, Tauchen and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Petrowski, Bewley, Cowles and Marklein

  2. Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  3. Mar 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 9, 2021 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  5. Jan 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 7, 2022 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  8. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Edming

  9. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  11. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  12. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:02 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  14. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  22. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Sporting Heritage, Small Business and Rural Issues

  23. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote