Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 54

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: farmland preservation implementation grants, agreements, and tax credits and making an appropriation. (FE)

Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Farmland preservation

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes the following changes involving farmland preservation

implementation grants and agreements and farmland preservation tax credits:

1. Decreases the minimum required length of a farmland preservation

agreement between the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection

and a farmland owner to 10 years from 15 years. Under current law, a farmland

owner who enters into a farmland preservation agreement with DATCP may be

eligible to receive farmland preservation tax credits for his or her qualifying acres

of farmland.

2. Requires DATCP to include in a report submitted to the Board of Agriculture,

Trade and Consumer Protection, the Joint Committee on Finance, the standing

committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over agriculture, the Department of

Revenue, and the Department of Administration a review of the tax credit amounts

for qualifying acres for the farmland preservation tax credit and recommendations

for the tax credit levels for qualifying acres of farmland. Current law requires

DATCP to submit a report about farmland and the farmland preservation program

once every two years to the board, DOR, and DOA.

3. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $7.50 to $10 the

amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are located

in a farmland preservation zoning district but are not subject to a farmland

preservation agreement.

4. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $5 to $10 the

amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are subject

to a farmland preservation agreement but are not located in a farmland preservation

zoning district.

5. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $10 to $12.50 the

amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are located

in a farmland preservation zoning district and are subject to a farmland preservation

agreement.

6. Adds a new category of farmland that qualifies for the farmland preservation

tax credit. A credit of $10 per acre may be claimed for farmland that is located in a

farmland preservation area, but only to the extent that the acres are covered by an

agricultural conservation easement.

7. Authorizes DATCP to award grants to cities, villages, towns, counties,

regional planning commissions, and tribal governments for various purposes related

to implementing a county's certified farmland preservation plan. Under the bill,

DATCP must enter into a contract with a grant recipient before distributing grant

funds, and the contract must identify costs eligible for reimbursement through the

grant for the following activities: 1) certifying a farmland preservation zoning

ordinance for the first time; 2) enrolling land in farmland preservation agreements;

3) designating an agricultural enterprise area or facilitating agricultural

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , B. Meyers (D) , Baldeh (D) , Bowen (D) , Cabrera (D) , Considine (D) , Drake (D) , Emerson (D) , Hebl (D) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Rozar (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Tranel (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Vruwink (D)

11 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Hesselbein (D) , Kitchens and Plumer , L. Taylor (D) , Neubauer (D) , Penterman (R) , Pfaff (D) , Ringhand (D) , Smith (D) , Testin (R) , Tittl (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Feb 1, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Oldenburg, Novak, Spreitzer, Anderson, Baldeh, Bowen, Cabrera, Considine, Drake, Emerson, Hebl, B. Meyers, Moses, Mursau, Rozar, Shankland, Skowronski, Subeck, Tranel, VanderMeer and Vruwink; cosponsored by Senators Testin, L. Taylor, Pfaff, Ringhand and Smith

  2. Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  3. Feb 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 1, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 5, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Representatives Kitchens and Plumer added as coauthors

  7. Mar 10, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Apr 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Allen added as a coauthor

  9. Apr 8, 2021 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Apr 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Hesselbein added as a coauthor

  11. Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Neubauer added as a coauthor

  12. Apr 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Tittl added as a coauthor

  13. Oct 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Oldenburg

  14. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  15. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  16. Feb 3, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Penterman added as a coauthor

  17. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1