Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: farmland preservation implementation grants, agreements, and tax credits and making an appropriation. (FE)
Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Farmland preservation
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes the following changes involving farmland preservation
implementation grants and agreements and farmland preservation tax credits:
1. Decreases the minimum required length of a farmland preservation
agreement between the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
and a farmland owner to 10 years from 15 years. Under current law, a farmland
owner who enters into a farmland preservation agreement with DATCP may be
eligible to receive farmland preservation tax credits for his or her qualifying acres
of farmland.
2. Requires DATCP to include in a report submitted to the Board of Agriculture,
Trade and Consumer Protection, the Joint Committee on Finance, the standing
committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over agriculture, the Department of
Revenue, and the Department of Administration a review of the tax credit amounts
for qualifying acres for the farmland preservation tax credit and recommendations
for the tax credit levels for qualifying acres of farmland. Current law requires
DATCP to submit a report about farmland and the farmland preservation program
once every two years to the board, DOR, and DOA.
3. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $7.50 to $10 the
amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are located
in a farmland preservation zoning district but are not subject to a farmland
preservation agreement.
4. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $5 to $10 the
amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are subject
to a farmland preservation agreement but are not located in a farmland preservation
zoning district.
5. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $10 to $12.50 the
amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are located
in a farmland preservation zoning district and are subject to a farmland preservation
agreement.
6. Adds a new category of farmland that qualifies for the farmland preservation
tax credit. A credit of $10 per acre may be claimed for farmland that is located in a
farmland preservation area, but only to the extent that the acres are covered by an
agricultural conservation easement.
7. Authorizes DATCP to award grants to cities, villages, towns, counties,
regional planning commissions, and tribal governments for various purposes related
to implementing a county's certified farmland preservation plan. Under the bill,
DATCP must enter into a contract with a grant recipient before distributing grant
funds, and the contract must identify costs eligible for reimbursement through the
grant for the following activities: 1) certifying a farmland preservation zoning
ordinance for the first time; 2) enrolling land in farmland preservation agreements;
3) designating an agricultural enterprise area or facilitating agricultural
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Anderson (D) , B. Meyers (D) , Baldeh (D) , Bowen (D) , Cabrera (D) , Considine (D) , Drake (D) , Emerson (D) , Hebl (D) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Rozar (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Tranel (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Vruwink (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 0
Passed 12–0 Feb 1, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Oldenburg, Novak, Spreitzer, Anderson, Baldeh, Bowen, Cabrera, Considine, Drake, Emerson, Hebl, B. Meyers, Moses, Mursau, Rozar, Shankland, Skowronski, Subeck, Tranel, VanderMeer and Vruwink; cosponsored by Senators Testin, L. Taylor, Pfaff, Ringhand and Smith
- Feb 10, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture
- Feb 11, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 1, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 5, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 9, 2021 · Assembly
- Mar 10, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 7, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Allen added as a coauthor
- Apr 8, 2021 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 9, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Hesselbein added as a coauthor
- Apr 13, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Neubauer added as a coauthor
- Apr 14, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Tittl added as a coauthor
- Oct 14, 2021 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Oldenburg
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 3, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Penterman added as a coauthor
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1