Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: prohibiting social media Internet site censorship of journalistic enterprises. (FE)
Damage personal injury Data processing Data processing — Privacy issues Deaf and hearing impaired Newspaper and magazine
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill prohibits a social media Internet site from censoring, deplatforming,
or shadow banning a journalistic enterprise on the basis of the content of its
publication or broadcast. The bill applies to social media Internet sites or
applications that enable users to communicate with each other and that have more
than 150 million users. The bill defines a “journalistic enterprise” as an entity that
publishes more than 10,000 words online with at least 5,000 paid subscribers or
10,000 monthly active users; publishes more than 100 hours of audio or video online
with at least 100 million viewers annually; operates a cable television channel that
provides more than 40 hours of content per week to more than 100,000 cable
television subscribers; or operates under a broadcast license issued by the Federal
Communications Commission.
Under the bill, a social media Internet site must also provide a mechanism for
a journalistic enterprise to request the number of other individual users who were
provided or shown the journalistic enterprise's content or posts, and to provide that
number to the journalistic enterprise upon request.
The bill also allows a journalistic enterprise to bring a private cause of action
against a social media Internet site if the Internet site violates the bill's
requirements. The bill provides that, in a private cause of action, a court may award
statutory damages of up to $100,000 for each proven violation; actual damages;
punitive damages if aggravating factors exist; other forms of equitable relief; and
costs and attorney fees.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Constitution and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 2
Passed 7–2 Feb 1, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Constitution and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 2
Passed 7–2 Feb 1, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 30, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sortwell, Cabral-Guevara, Allen, Brandtjen, Edming, Horlacher, Knodl and Kuglitsch; cosponsored by Senators Roth, Stroebel, Felzkowski, Nass and Darling
- Sep 30, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Constitution and Ethics
- Oct 1, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor
- Oct 11, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 3, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sortwell
- Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Steffen added as a coauthor
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Constitution and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 2
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Constitution and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 2
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1