Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: regulating kratom products, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Crime and criminals Drugs Food Legislature — Criminal penalties joint review committee on Plants
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill defines kratom products as products intended for human or animal
consumption, including food, drink, chewing gum, and food supplements, made from
any part of a leaf of the Mitragyna speciosa plant, and legalizes the manufacture,
distribution, delivery, and possession of kratom.
Under current law, kratom is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance and
if a person manufactures, distributes, or delivers kratom, he or she is guilty of a Class
H felony, and if a person possesses kratom he or she is guilty of a misdemeanor. The
bill removes kratom from the schedule of controlled substances and legalizes the
manufacture, distribution, delivery, and possession of kratom, subject to certain
limitations.
Under the bill, a person who prepares or processes a kratom product (a
processor) may not distribute the product if it 1) is mixed or packed with another
substance that affects the kratom product's quality or strength to such a degree that
it may cause injury; 2) contains a poisonous ingredient, controlled substance, or
controlled substance analog; 3) contains a level of 7-hydroxymitragynine that is
greater than 2 percent; 4) contains any synthetic alkaloid; or 5) does not include a
label that states the amount of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine contained
in the product. The bill also prohibits the sale of a kratom product to any person
under the age of 21. A person who violates either of these provisions is guilty of a
Class C misdemeanor.
The bill also requires a processor to obtain a food processing plant license from
the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, and to register a
kratom product before distributing it. A processor who prepares, processes, sells,
offers for sale, or distributes a kratom product that is not registered with DATCP or
without a food processing license is subject to a monetary penalty, to be determined
by DATCP by rule.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Cabral-Guevara (R) , Murphy (R) , Sinicki (D)
5 cosponsors
Brostoff (D) , Drake (D) , Felzkowski (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Macco (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 2
Passed 9–2 Feb 1, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 7, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Cabral-Guevara, Sinicki and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Felzkowski and L. Taylor
- Oct 7, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Nov 4, 2021 · Assembly
Representative James added as a coauthor
- Nov 5, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 10, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 1, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Drake added as a coauthor
- Dec 8, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Dec 15, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Brostoff added as a coauthor
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 2
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly
Representative James withdrawn as a coauthor
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Wichgers withdrawn as a coauthor
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Macco added as a coauthor
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 8:31 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Hesselbein, Anderson, Brostoff, Considine, Doyle, Goyke, Hebl, Hong, B. Meyers, McGuire, Moore Omokunde, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Pope, Shankland, Shelton, Snodgrass, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Stubbs, Subeck, Vining and Vruwink
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Neubauer
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1