Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 634

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: allowing a court commissioner to address stipulated final legal separation hearings.

Court — Commissioner Marriage

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill extends the authority of a court commissioner to preside over a final

hearing in an action for legal separation under certain circumstances. Under current

law, a court commissioner may preside over a final hearing to determine whether a

judgment of divorce will be granted if both parties to the action state that the

marriage is irretrievably broken and that the parties have resolved all material

issues or if one party does not participate in the divorce action. This bill extends that

authority to actions for legal separation. Under the bill, the court commissioner may

preside over a final hearing to determine if a judgment of legal separation will be

granted if both parties to the action state that the marital relationship is broken and

that the parties have resolved all material issues. The court commissioner may also

preside over any hearing held to determine whether a judgment of legal separation

will be granted when one party does not participate in the action. Under current law,

a court commissioner may proceed to grant and enter judgment in an action for

divorce over which the commissioner has presided unless the commissioner does not

approve of an agreement between the parties on material issues. Under the bill, a

court commissioner may exercise that same authority in an action for legal

separation.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Billings (D) , Cabrera (D) , Dittrich (R) , Doyle (D) , Duchow (R) , J. Rodriguez (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Sinicki (D) , Snyder (R) , Tusler (R)

5 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Johnson (D) , Knodl (R) , Marklein (R) , Roys (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 1, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives J. Rodriguez, Snyder, Doyle, Billings, Cabrera, Dittrich, Duchow, Kuglitsch, Tusler and Sinicki; cosponsored by Senators Ballweg, Marklein, Johnson and Roys

  2. Oct 21, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Nov 3, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Knodl added as a coauthor

  4. Dec 1, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 by Committee on Rules

  9. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  10. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1