Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 67

Storage and processing of sexual assault kits and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 12, 2021

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2022: “Representative Doyle added as a coauthor”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, there is no statutory procedure for the collection and processing of sexual assault kits. This bill creates procedures for transmission, processing, and storage of sexual assault kits. Under the bill, a health care professional who collects a sexual assault kit must do one of the following: 1) if the victim wants to report the sexual assault to law enforcement, the health care professional must notify a law enforcement agency within 24 hours of collecting the kit; or 2) if the victim does not want to report the sexual assault to law enforcement, the health care professional must send the kit to the state crime laboratories within 72 hours for storage. Under the bill, if a law enforcement agency has received notification from a health care professional that a kit has been collected, the law enforcement agency must take possession of the kit within 72 hours, and must send the kit to the state crime laboratories for processing within 14 days. If the victim changes his or her mind about wanting to have his or her kit analyzed after it is given to a law enforcement agency but before the agency sends the kit to the state crime laboratories for processing, the agency must send the kit to the state crime laboratories for storage rather than for processing.

Under the bill, once the state crime laboratories takes possession of a sexual assault kit, it must do one of the following: 1) if it has received the kit of a person who has not consented to analysis, securely store the kit for a period of 10 years; or 2) if it has received the kit of a person who has consented to analysis, process the kit and then send it to a law enforcement agency to store the kit for a period of 50 years, or until the date of the expiration of the statute of limitations, or until the end of a term of imprisonment or probation of a person convicted in the sexual assault case, whichever is longer.

Read the full summary

Under current law, local law enforcement agencies report certain crime statistics to the Department of Justice. The bill requires law enforcement agencies to provide additional data to DOJ regarding sexual assault kits collected and processed in Wisconsin in addition to the data currently being reported. The bill also requires DOJ to publish data on law enforcement agency compliance with DOJ reporting requirements.

Who's behind it

14 lawmakers are its ⁠. 10 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 27 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (13)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  2. Mar 15, 2022

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Nov 11, 2021 to Mar 10, 2022

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  4. Nov 2, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Oct 11, 2021 to Oct 14, 2021

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  6. Oct 6, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Oct 6, 2021

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  8. Oct 5, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Feb 17, 2021 to Sep 29, 2021

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  10. Feb 12, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

  11. Feb 12, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 12, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Steffen, Macco, Thiesfeldt, Brooks, Cabrera, Gundrum, Kerkman, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Rozar, Schraa, Spreitzer, Subeck and Vining; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Agard, Darling, Petrowski and Wanggaard

  2. Feb 12, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Feb 17, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor

  4. Sep 29, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

  5. Sep 30, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steffen

  6. Oct 5, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Senator Jacque added as a cosponsor

  8. Oct 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Oct 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Shelton added as a coauthor

  10. Oct 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Bowen added as a coauthor

  11. Nov 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steffen

  12. Nov 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Nov 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  14. Mar 10, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Anderson added as a coauthor

  15. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  16. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Doyle added as a coauthor

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate