Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 707

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: creating an exception to the 40-year recording requirement for recorded access easements.

Easement Land Real property

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law generally bars actions affecting title to real estate that are based

on instruments executed or recorded more than 30 years prior to the commencement

of the action unless an instrument expressly referring to the existence of the claim

or defense has been recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the county where

the real estate is located within 30 years after the execution or recording of the

original instrument and within each successive 30-year period thereafter. Under

current law, the recording requirement for recorded easements and covenants

restricting the use of real estate is 40 years, rather than 30 years. Current law

provides a number of exceptions to these limitation periods. For example, the

recording requirement does not apply to a conservation easement or to any interest

in real estate owned by a railroad corporation, public service corporation, or the

state.

This bill creates an additional exception to the recording requirement for an

easement that is set forth in a recorded instrument and that allows a person to travel

across another's land to reach a location or for another specified purpose (access

easement). In other words, under the bill, an action to enforce an access easement

is not barred based on the failure to record the access easement within a certain

period of time.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , Horlacher (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Ramthun (R)

5 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Jacque (R) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Stroebel (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 1, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 12, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Allen, Horlacher, Moses and Ramthun; cosponsored by Senators Jacque, Stroebel and Ballweg

  2. Nov 12, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government

  3. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Murphy

  9. Feb 14, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Murphy

  10. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:42 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  11. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  13. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1