Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: creating an exception to the 40-year recording requirement for recorded access easements.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally bars actions affecting title to real estate that are based
on instruments executed or recorded more than 30 years prior to the commencement
of the action unless an instrument expressly referring to the existence of the claim
or defense has been recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the county where
the real estate is located within 30 years after the execution or recording of the
original instrument and within each successive 30-year period thereafter. Under
current law, the recording requirement for recorded easements and covenants
restricting the use of real estate is 40 years, rather than 30 years. Current law
provides a number of exceptions to these limitation periods. For example, the
recording requirement does not apply to a conservation easement or to any interest
in real estate owned by a railroad corporation, public service corporation, or the
state.
This bill creates an additional exception to the recording requirement for an
easement that is set forth in a recorded instrument and that allows a person to travel
across another's land to reach a location or for another specified purpose (access
easement). In other words, under the bill, an action to enforce an access easement
is not barred based on the failure to record the access easement within a certain
period of time.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Feb 1, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 12, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Allen, Horlacher, Moses and Ramthun; cosponsored by Senators Jacque, Stroebel and Ballweg
- Nov 12, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government
- Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Murphy
- Feb 14, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Murphy
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 8:42 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Spreitzer added as a coauthor
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1