Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 727

Creating a commercial nitrogen optimization pilot program, providing crop insurance rebates for cover crops, creating a hydrogeologist position, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 8, 2022. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 2, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2022

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 8, 2022

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2021 Wisconsin Act 223

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2022: “Published 4-9-2022”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates a commercial nitrogen optimization pilot program, provides crop insurance premium rebates for planting cover crops, and creates a new hydrogeologist position at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension.

Commercial nitrogen optimization pilot program The bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to create a commercial nitrogen optimization pilot program, under which DATCP awards grants to farmers to implement a project, for at least two growing seasons, that optimizes the application of commercial nitrogen. The farmer must collaborate with a University of Wisconsin System institution to monitor grant projects on-site. The institution may receive a grant for its monitoring requirements under the bill.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, a grant to a farmer and the eligible university entity collaborating with the farmer may not exceed, in total, $50,000. No more than 20 percent of this total amount may be awarded to the collaborating university entity.

The bill requires DATCP to attempt to provide grants to farmers in different parts of the state and to provide grants for projects in areas that have different soil types or geologic characteristics. The bill requires DATCP to prioritize projects that are innovative and that are not currently funded through existing state or federal programs and to prioritize farmers who plan to implement projects for longer periods. The bill also requires DATCP to collaborate with the farmer and the university when awarding grants under the pilot program.

Under the bill, a farmer and the university collaborating with the farmer are immune from civil liability and may not be subject to any remedial action or other administrative or enforcement action from DATCP or the Department of Natural Resources for any discharge of environmental pollution from the land involved in the project, if the actions were taken in good faith and conformed to the project specifications that were proposed in an application for a grant under the program.

Cover crop insurance premium rebates In addition, the bill authorizes DATCP to cooperate with the Risk Management Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to provide rebates in the amount of $5 per acre of a cover crop planted for crop insurance premiums paid for those acres.

Under the bill, DATCP determines the cover crops for which crop insurance premium rebates are provided, and a person must plant cover crops before submitting an application to DATCP for a crop insurance premium rebate. Also, under the bill, a crop insurance premium rebate may not be provided for the planting of a cover crop on an acre for which funding for planting a cover crop is available from a producer-led watershed protection grant, the soil and water resource management program, the federal Environmental Quality Incentives Program, or the federal Conservation Stewardship Program.

Hydrogeologist position Finally, the bill requires the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to create a three-year project position for one full-time hydrogeologist for the geological and natural history survey, which is part of the Division of Extension of UW-Madison. The position must focus on developing groundwater resource information primarily at county or local scales and assisting state and local governments, industries, and the public in interpreting and using the information.

Who's behind it

23 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Republicans and 11 are Democrats.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 35 names

Authors (23)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 4 · Feb 22, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 16 to 0 · Feb 22, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 96 to 0 · Feb 23, 2022 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (96)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 4, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 8, 2022

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 8, 2022

    The governor signed it. It became 2021 Wisconsin Act 223.

  3. Apr 4, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 8, 2022

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 7, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Mar 4, 2022

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 24, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  8. Feb 23, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly passed it, 96 to 0.

  10. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 22, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 22, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.

  13. Feb 18, 2022

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  14. Feb 18, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.

  15. Feb 8, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jan 5, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Jan 4, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  18. Dec 2, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  19. Dec 2, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Novak, Tranel, Shankland, Krug, Hong, Milroy, Mursau, Neubauer, Oldenburg, Penterman, Plumer, Tauchen, Petryk, Subeck, Spiros, Considine, Pope, Vining, Spreitzer, Ohnstad, Conley and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Testin, Ballweg, Bernier, Petrowski, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith and Wimberger

  2. Dec 2, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  3. Dec 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kitchens

  4. Jan 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Vruwink added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  9. Feb 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  10. Feb 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  11. Feb 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kitchens

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:45 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  17. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  19. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 0

  22. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  24. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  25. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  26. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  27. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Mar 7, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Brostoff added as a coauthor

  29. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 9, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-15-2022

  36. Apr 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker

  37. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 223

  38. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Published 4-9-2022

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote