Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 756

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: changes to the administration of the code of ethics, as recommended by the Ethics Commission.

Ethics Ethics commission Lobbying

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill bill makes various changes to the administration of the code of ethics,

as recommended by the Ethics Commission.

The bill eliminates a requirement that the Ethics Commission compile and post

on its Internet site for access by the public information received by the commission

from state agencies and related to certain pending contracts and orders with the

agencies. The bill also eliminates a requirement that the commission regularly,

during the course of a legislative session, give reports to the legislature that provide

information about licensed lobbyists, principals, and their lobbying activities.

The bill changes the definition of “security” as that term is used in connection

with the types of financial information an individual required to file with the Ethics

Commission must disclose on his or her statement of economic interests. Current law

requires state public office holders and certain state employees to annually file a

statement of economic interests and to identify the employers, investments, real

estate, commercial clients, and creditors of the individual and his or her family

members.

Current law requires a state public official to file a statement of economic

interests with the commission no later than April 30 of any year in which the

individual held office on January 1 of that year. The bill modifies current law so that

an official must file the statement only if he or she held office on January 1 and for

at least 14 days. The bill also requires an official to file a statement no later than 21

days following the date on which the official leaves office. The individual is then not

required to file another statement of economic interests until such time as the

individual again becomes a state public official.

Under the bill, if a state or local public official receives an item that the code of

ethics does not permit the official to accept or retain, the official must do one of the

following:

1. Give the item to the official's agency to use or sell, except that the agency may

not sell the item to any government employee or official.

2. Give the item to another state or local agency or to a public institution, such

as a local school, library, or museum, that can use the item.

3. Give the item to a charitable organization, not including a charitable

organization to which the official or his or her immediate family is associated.

4. Return the item to the donor.

5. If the donor is neither a lobbyist nor a principal (a person who employs a

lobbyist), purchase the item at its full retail value and keep the item.

This provision codifies the guideline issued by the Ethics Commission for the

disposition of gifts received by state and local public officials.

Finally, the bill repeals a provision that prohibits an officer or employee of a

state agency from requesting appropriations for that agency in excess of the

appropriations already requested. The U.S. District Court in the Eastern District

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cabral-Guevara (R) , Murphy (R) , Spiros (R) , Wichgers (R)

1 cosponsors

Bernier (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Feb 22, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Feb 22, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Wichgers, Cabral-Guevara, Murphy and Spiros; cosponsored by Senator Bernier

  2. Dec 7, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Wichgers

  5. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  8. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:49 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  10. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1