Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 777

Grants to political subdivisions for additional policing and strategic planning to combat crime and grants for beat patrol and specialized officers. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 8, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 9, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 25, 2022

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 20 to 12

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 8, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Grants for additional policing This bill authorizes the Department of Administration to award one or more grants to a city, village, town, or county for costs associated with additional policing to address automobile theft and carjacking. DOA must give priority to cities, villages, towns, or counties having a higher incidence of automobile theft or carjacking. Grants may be used to cover up to four years of additional policing costs but may not be used to supplant funding that is available from other sources.

The bill requires the governor to allocate at least $5,000,000 of the moneys received under the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to the additional policing grant program. Before DOA may award grants using the allocated money, DOA must submit a plan for the program to the Joint Committee on Finance for approval. The plan must ensure that the grants will be distributed throughout all geographic areas of Wisconsin and in both urban and rural communities.

Read the full summary

The bill also includes a requirement that grant recipients submit reports to DOA describing in detail how grant moneys were expended and the results of the expenditures, including any impact on the number of persons arrested and charged for automobile theft or carjacking.

Grants for strategic planning The bill further authorizes DOA to award one or more grants to a city, village, town, or county for costs associated with strategic planning to combat crime. Grants may be used to cover up to two years of strategic planning costs but may not be used to supplant funding that is available from other sources.

The bill requires the governor to allocate at least $5,000,000 of the moneys received under the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to the strategic planning grant program. Before DOA may award grants using the allocated money, DOA must submit a plan for the grant program to the Joint Committee on Finance for approval. The plan must ensure that the grants will be distributed throughout all geographic areas of Wisconsin and in both urban and rural communities.

The bill also includes a requirement that grant recipients submit a report to DOA describing in detail how grant moneys were expended and the results of such expenditures.

Grants for uniformed beat patrol and public safety goals Under current law, the Department of Justice awards grants to cities to pay for uniformed beat patrol law enforcement officers. The bill expands the grant program to allow villages, town, and counties, in addition to cities, to apply for such grants and to allow grant recipients to use grant funds to pay for law enforcement officers whose primary duties relate to achieving a law enforcement or public safety goal. The bill also eliminates the current-law cap of $150,000 per grant and eliminates the requirement that DOJ award the grant to the applicants with the highest rates of violent crime. The bill eliminates the current law that allows for grants to be awarded for three consecutive years and instead requires annual applications. Also, under the bill, a grant recipient that applies for an additional grant must provide a statement to DOJ regarding its progress in achieving the goals for which the previous grant was awarded.

Who's behind it

7 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 7 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 0 · Jan 19, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 5 · Jan 19, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 9, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 59 to 33 · Jan 25, 2022 · 7 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (59)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Mar 2, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 20 to 12 · Mar 8, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 20, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 12 · Mar 8, 2022 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 8, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 4, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 8, 2022

    The Senate passed it too, 20 to 12.

  5. Mar 2, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  6. Feb 25, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  7. Feb 17, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Jan 26, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  9. Jan 26, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  10. Jan 25, 2022

    The Assembly passed it, 59 to 33.

  11. Jan 25, 2022

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Jan 19, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jan 19, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Jan 19, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 5.

  15. Jan 10, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jan 5, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  17. Jan 5, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  18. Dec 9, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

  19. Dec 9, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Cabral-Guevara, Armstrong, Brandtjen, Edming, Moses, Murphy and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senator Jacque

  2. Dec 9, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Jan 3, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Cabral-Guevara

  4. Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 5, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 10, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative McGuire

  8. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  10. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 9, Noes 5

  11. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 by Committee on Rules

  14. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 33

  19. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  22. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  23. Feb 25, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Milroy added as a coauthor

  24. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  25. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  26. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Pfaff, Smith and Ringhand

  29. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  31. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  32. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  33. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  34. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  35. Mar 9, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  36. Mar 11, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2022

  37. Apr 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker

  38. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  39. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  40. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote