Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 834

No-knock search warrants and certain expenditures of federal moneys by first class cities. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 8, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 7, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 58 to 34

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 20 to 12

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 8, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law as provided in the U.S. Supreme Court case Richards v.

Wisconsin , a law enforcement officer may execute a search warrant without knocking and announcing his or her presence if he or she has a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing his or her presence, under the particular circumstances, would be dangerous or futile or would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime.

Read the full summary

This bill creates a statutory provision that provides that right to law enforcement officers and further provides that:

1. No city, village, town, or county may adopt an ordinance or policy that restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.

2. No board of fire and police commissioners may prescribe rules or regulations that restrict a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.

3. No sheriff or chief of a law enforcement agency may adopt a policy that restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.

4. No mayor or common council may issue an order that restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.

The bill also requires a first class city (currently, only the city of Milwaukee) to expend a portion of the moneys it receives under the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to fund operations of the city's police department. The portion that must be expended for these purposes is the total amount of ARPA funds received by the city multiplied by the result of dividing the amount that the city expended in 2021 for law enforcement purposes by the total amount expended by the city from its general fund in 2021 for all purposes. The bill also requires that in any year that a first class city receives ARPA funds, the city must expend at least as much from its general fund for the city's police department as it did in 2021.

Who's behind it

25 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 25 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 30 names

Authors (25)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 5 · Jan 19, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 9, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 58 to 34 · Jan 25, 2022 · 7 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (58)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Mar 2, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 12 · Mar 8, 2022 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 8, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 4, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 8, 2022

    The Senate passed it too, 20 to 12.

  5. Mar 2, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  6. Feb 17, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Jan 26, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  8. Jan 26, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  9. Jan 25, 2022

    The Assembly passed it, 58 to 34.

  10. Jan 24, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Jan 19, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Jan 19, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 5.

  13. Jan 14, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jan 12, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jan 11, 2022 to Jan 12, 2022

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  16. Jan 7, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

  17. Jan 7, 2022

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 7, 2022 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler, Edming, Armstrong, Callahan, Steffen, Dittrich, Petersen, Brandtjen, Tittl, Gundrum, Novak, Kurtz, Krug, Knodl, James, Plumer, Skowronski, Kuglitsch, Macco, Born, Murphy, Kitchens, Swearingen, Sanfelippo and Cabral-Guevara; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard and Jacque

  2. Jan 7, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Jan 11, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 11, 2022 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  5. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Dallman added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 14, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 9, Noes 5

  10. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 by Committee on Rules

  12. Jan 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Duchow added as a coauthor

  13. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 58, Noes 34

  17. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  20. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  23. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  29. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Mar 9, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Mar 11, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2022

  32. Apr 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker

  33. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  34. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote