Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 834

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: no-knock search warrants and certain expenditures of federal moneys by first class cities. (FE)

Federal aid Milwaukee — City Milwaukee — School Police Search warrant

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law as provided in the U.S. Supreme Court case

Richards v.

Wisconsin

, a law enforcement officer may execute a search warrant without knocking

and announcing his or her presence if he or she has a reasonable suspicion that

knocking and announcing his or her presence, under the particular circumstances,

would be dangerous or futile or would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime.

This bill creates a statutory provision that provides that right to law enforcement

officers and further provides that:

1. No city, village, town, or county may adopt an ordinance or policy that

restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search

warrant.

2. No board of fire and police commissioners may prescribe rules or regulations

that restrict a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search

warrant.

3. No sheriff or chief of a law enforcement agency may adopt a policy that

restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search

warrant.

4. No mayor or common council may issue an order that restricts a law

enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.

The bill also requires a first class city (currently, only the city of Milwaukee) to

expend a portion of the moneys it receives under the federal American Rescue Plan

Act of 2021 to fund operations of the city's police department. The portion that must

be expended for these purposes is the total amount of ARPA funds received by the

city multiplied by the result of dividing the amount that the city expended in 2021

for law enforcement purposes by the total amount expended by the city from its

general fund in 2021 for all purposes. The bill also requires that in any year that a

first class city receives ARPA funds, the city must expend at least as much from its

general fund for the city's police department as it did in 2021.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Callahan (R) , Dittrich (R) , Edming (R) , Gundrum (R) , James (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Kurtz (R) , Macco (R) , Murphy (R) , Novak (R) , Petersen (R) , Plumer (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Skowronski (R) , Steffen (R) , Swearingen (R) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R)

5 cosponsors

Dallman (R) , Duchow (R) , Jacque (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Wichgers (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 9, Noes 5

Passed 9–5 Jan 19, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: PASSAGE

Passed 58–34 Jan 25, 2022 official source full page

Aye · 58

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2

Passed 5–2 Mar 2, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 7, 2022 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler, Edming, Armstrong, Callahan, Steffen, Dittrich, Petersen, Brandtjen, Tittl, Gundrum, Novak, Kurtz, Krug, Knodl, James, Plumer, Skowronski, Kuglitsch, Macco, Born, Murphy, Kitchens, Swearingen, Sanfelippo and Cabral-Guevara; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard and Jacque

  2. Jan 7, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Jan 11, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 11, 2022 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  5. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Dallman added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 14, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 9, Noes 5

  10. Jan 19, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 by Committee on Rules

  12. Jan 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Duchow added as a coauthor

  13. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 58, Noes 34

  17. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  20. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  23. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  29. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Mar 9, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Mar 11, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-11-2022

  32. Apr 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker

  33. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  34. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82